@SPP-Ottawa: I don't know exactly what to say - I didn't design or engrave the coin, I just try to present coins from my collection and give a little background on them.
From what I can see, in the early 2000s, it was somewhat common for the Mint to use sans serif fonts (like the one on the 2010 SD) as part of the refresh/modernization of its coin designs. It appears to have decided that the 2010 LE SD was a good candidate for such. I agree, however, that as a coin replicating the iconic design of one from 75 years earlier, it would have been best for them to stick with the original coin's letter style.
As for the tree on the island, I'm sure you're also likely aware that it was in this time frame that the Mint began incorporating multiple finishes on its proof coins to add visual variety. This SD appears to be an example. Whether or not it was a good choice is a personal decision, I suppose. For example, the brilliant vs. frosted tree doesn't bother me in the least.
From what I can see, in the early 2000s, it was somewhat common for the Mint to use sans serif fonts (like the one on the 2010 SD) as part of the refresh/modernization of its coin designs. It appears to have decided that the 2010 LE SD was a good candidate for such. I agree, however, that as a coin replicating the iconic design of one from 75 years earlier, it would have been best for them to stick with the original coin's letter style.
As for the tree on the island, I'm sure you're also likely aware that it was in this time frame that the Mint began incorporating multiple finishes on its proof coins to add visual variety. This SD appears to be an example. Whether or not it was a good choice is a personal decision, I suppose. For example, the brilliant vs. frosted tree doesn't bother me in the least.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.




















