Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1941 S Nickel. Not As Good As I Had Hoped. What Do You Think In Terms Of Grading? :(

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 2,022Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
Newherehavingfun's Avatar
United States
190 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2022  3:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Newherehavingfun to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
This is not an XF coin. High AU at worse, leaning low MS personally.

Marks at the high points are planchet marks, marks that were on the planchet before striking they were not removed by strike. Very common to see in this series on weakly struck examples. Points where these can be seen are the hair above the ear, jaw, and shoulder, along with the lower steps and central portion of Monticello on the reverse. Same can be said for the rim marks on the obverse at K12, K2, and K6.

A fingerprint is not an indicator of a circulated coin, just a mishandled coin.

First set of pics show a problem free example. The second set, showing blast white surface, with some frost in the below points, make it look like it may have been dipped. This could very well be a lighting issue as well. This is why grading from images is so difficult. Grading is already an opinionated subject, grading solely by images makes it more subjective.


Thanks for the clarity. Wow. To me it looks like heavy wear, due to my inexperience. So this is very helpful. I wish I could get better pics but with my phone it's impossible. Under the 2x2 it looked so beautiful. If it's been dipped then is its value degraded? I know not to clean coins and that would make the seller a total fraud. Ugh. A lot to learn! The first images were taken in daylight, the second were under various light sources, one being aimed directly at the coin. So, it's hard to tell but I understand what you're saying. Thanks so much.
Valued Member
Newherehavingfun's Avatar
United States
190 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2022  3:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Newherehavingfun to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
the surfaces have a sort of granular haze to them that I've never seen before, and I've studied nickels more than any other denomination, it makes me think Ty2020b is correct this coin may have been dipped in some sort of cleaner in the past, or maybe the photos simply exaggerate a natural frost, unusual coins like this need to be in hand for a precise grade

Thank you. It's so costly to grade, my original intent before asking in the forum was to send it in, but now I am not so sure. I will check prices at ANACS to see but I certainly don't want to waste more money on a coin that's been cleaned lol. Did you see the same haze in both sets of photos? Thank you very much.
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2022  7:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nick10 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
not worth pro grading IMO

the original photos show a bit of haze too, which pair of photos comes closest to the coin's appearance while in hand?
Valued Member
Newherehavingfun's Avatar
United States
190 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2022  11:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Newherehavingfun to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
not worth pro grading IMO

the original photos show a bit of haze too, which pair of photos comes closest to the coin's appearance while in hand?

To be honest, neither. Which doesn't help any of us. To the eye it looks really nice and superbly shiny and lustrous. More like it does behind the 2x2. (Included below) Without magnification it looks pretty great.

1941-S-Nickel.-Not-As-Good-As-I-Had-Hoped.--What-Do-You-Think-In-Terms-Of-Grading?-:
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 2,022Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums