I recently found this among my mother's hat box of old coins, and it intrigued me. Is this a coin that shows 'brockage', or has someone had a go with a hammer for some reason?
with the above - it's just post-mint damage. Rather like the pre-decimal British bronze penny, the French 10-centimes coins issued from 1852 to 1917 were sometimes horribly mistreated by schoolkids and others with too much time on their hands - the coins had nice big surfaces to mutilate and had a low face value!
Yes, sorry, there's nothing in the coin minting process, either 1700s or more modern, that can make a coin look like this. This be just a mangled coin.
Brockages are never ambiguous or half-done; it's impossible* to have a coin that's only a "partial brockage". On a brockage, the entire design of one side of the coin is mirror-incuse-reversed on the other side, with no trace whatsoever of the "proper" design for the other side showing underneath. Something that "looks like a partial brockage" is almost always a "shed job", made by squeezing two coins together. This, on the other hand, looks like someone simply attacked it with a knife, or a screwdriver.
* - OK, it's conceivable that there might be some extraordinary sequence of events that causes a piece of the brockaging coin to break off, creating a "partial brockage" on resultant coins. But I've never heard of that happening, and if it happened, it wouldn't look like this.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use