Post strike damaged. Not a mint error. (All U.S. coins 1965-1967 coins did not have mintmarks) Why? This was when the silver was being pulled from circulation (Then the value was 4 Times face value for silver content, now more than that!) and to prevent coin collectors from pulling so many coins from circulation the current years, they had no mintmarks. How do I know that? I lived through that time. Get a cold soda for 10 cents. But minimum wage then was $1.00 per hour. So things were not all good/bad.
Something odd that Dearborn's image highlights are the slight misalignment of the damage on both sides. I've added lines to his images to show this. The red line represents the top of the damage on the obverse which is much lower than the damage on the reverse. Just a curiosity that seems odd to me.
(EDIT: Maybe it's just the fact that the two images are slightly rotated in opposite directions that is causing this.)
Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups. We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use