| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,239 |
|
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
139 Posts |
Not sure. Those elongated letters look legit to me, and the date maybe looked a bit thin. I was referencing the following. Can you please post a full image of the obverse and reverse to show the die markers? Are the die scratches in the eye present on yours? http://varietyvista.com/09d%20WQ%20...6PDDO001.htm |
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
No point in matching markers until you match the doubled die. I do not think it is 001,look close at the U. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3535 Posts |
 I looked briefly at the DDO-001 online and have to agree, it does not match the poster's coin for a doubled die. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73952 Posts |
 To CCF! Not seeing a Doubled Die. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
United States
95460 Posts |
Well, the tops of the letter show a n/s expansion, but no split serifs, so I'm not too sure on this one (yet) |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not seeing a DDO here. to the CCF! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7174 Posts |
to the CCF There is only 1 DDO for 66 and it's a big one. Both spread and worth. http://www.coppercoins.com/advsearch.php As stated above, markers don't mean a thing if you don't have the DD first. I think your scope is deforming the image of the coin. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2376 Posts |
I agree with the above comments.
Additionally, 1966 DDO-001 is a business strike, not a SMS strike.
It will not be found in those sets.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
388 Posts |
Definitely not seeing any cw thickness on IN GOD WE TRUST nor the listed thickness on the date. I'm going to have to say no on DDO-001.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,239 |
|
Posted 02/06/2024 11:11 am
