when comparing it must be apples to apples not watermelon to elephants.
So chase is Incorrect and I do for a fact have what I stated.
So, while in Wexler's you see a 1919-S WRPM-002 S/S TITLED Look at the photo. Of course it would wouldn't fix as its not a titled I have but a S/S SOUTH!

WHAT u are looking at is not what I have that is a wrpm-002 which uses LDS to compare die marks as the S/S IS TILTED!! . so the grid u drew of course it would fit its TILTED. as well as different photo imagines from what I am comparing to.
which is not what I sated I Have at S/S SOUTH not a S/S TITLED

now this photo which is the correct photo to compare my 1919S-1MM-001 WRPM-001too. Be precise is everything as this is a photo to compare for example here is mine Remeber do u see the (MDS) we do not want to use the photos referring to (LDS) as I don't have a S/S TITLED.

So to be pretty percise I would have to say that for a fact I do have a 1919S-1MM-001 WRPM-001
and remember being accurate is very important so again here is a recap that a matter of fact I do have a Very Rare coin!!!!!!!!!!!!
use info below to compare my coin

do not use info below to compare my coin as it is not a S/S TILTED

AGAIN apples to apples here is what he stated which is incorrect to compare to as they are using (LDS) images
markers for LDS images
LDS markers
Obverse
Faint mintmark to south, most notable on the lower curve of S
Reverse
Die gouge between NT of CENT, criss-crossing die scratches under CA of AMERICA to right wheat stem.
Markers for MDS images
No verifiable markers found on the specimen examined.
Reverse
The field between the N and T of cent is uneven, possibly due to deteriration. Reverse is LDS.
so yay I do have a rare coin!!!! so below me is not what u compare my coin to!!

Edited by Littlemg2
02/08/2025 1:44 pm