Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop CCF Members on eBay! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Which One Of These Victorian Era Dokdo Coins Doesn't Belong?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 709Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
258 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2025  8:02 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add jdsstrat to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Sorting through a collection of these one dokdo coins from Kutch, India, AD 1882/VS 1938, I came across the coin on the right. I understand that these were handmade in part and that a certain amount of variety is to be expected. But this? The details are off more than others I have, way off, and to boot when you flip it you get what you see in the second picture. According to Numista, these coins are supposed to be aligned like a coin and as you can see the coin on the left is aligned like that while the coin on the left is not. Could it be a counterfeit? Thoughts? Comments? Questions?
Which-One-Of-These-Victorian-Era-Dokdo-Coins-Doesn't-Belong?
Which-One-Of-These-Victorian-Era-Dokdo-Coins-Doesn't-Belong?
Edited by jdsstrat
05/06/2025 8:36 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16805 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2025  8:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
While you expect some variance for coins in the Indian States series, I would agree this one seems extra-odd. The missing bits in the date-characters imply to me the coin was struck over another coin, which was a rare but not unheard-of practice in India at the time. But I'm not sure simply "being overstruck" can explain all the oddities seen here.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2025  9:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jdsstrat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
How common was counterfeiting?
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16805 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2025  10:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know, but there wasn't a lot of profit to be made for a counterfeiter with Indian coppers, unless the suspect coin is considerably underweight.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts
 Posted 05/07/2025  05:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jdsstrat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not considerably, about .35 grams less than usual.
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 709Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums