| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 5,010 |
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
35 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2605 Posts |
Let's start with the Elizabethan one. First, when you said it was just under an inch I thought it had to be a groat. But the groats don't have a date above shield. So, it does look like 6 pence dated 1561, which means it was a part of the 3rd issue minted 1561 - 1577. Now, there are some puzzling details. The obverse legend (for all varieties) is supposed to read ELIZABETH DG ANG FR ET HIB REGINA, but I don't see HIB, only H or maybe HI. The other thing is the mintmark on the reverse, above 61, before the legend. It looks like a coronet to me, but the coins with this mark are supposed to be undated. Here's what I have for the years of issue for this variety, and you can figure out which one fits your coin (you can see the mintmark better than I): pheon: 1561 - 65; rose: 1565; portcullis: 1566; lion, undated: 1566 -67; coronet, undated: 1567 - 70; castle: 1569 - 71; ermine, undated: 1572 -73; acorn: 1573 -74; eglantine: 1573 - 77. The Coincraft Catalogue lists those at £10 for poor and £22 for VG (I am not an expert in grading). I'll keep working on the other coin
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
35 Posts |
i just got the eye glass out and checked the coin,it is definately a coronet.i think it could quite possibly be 1568.googled the coin and I did find some dated ones.Thanks very much for your help, I can label it up and add it to my collection now. I think its time to invest in "spink coins of england". hopefully get a few more interesting finds this weekend.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2605 Posts |
OK, let me work through the penny now. First sure thing is the reverse legend, which reads CIVITAS CANTOR (Canterbury mint). It produced coins for Ed I, II, and III, and unfortunately the pennies were very similar. The obverse legend. I'm pretty sure it is EDWAR ANGL DNS HYB (Edward King of England and Lord of Ireland), which rules out Ed I - Canterbury mint had a bunch of extra letters in the legend for him. The way to distinguish between Ed II and III is the letter N. On the coin for Ed III it should be "Lombardic", especially in the DNS part. On your coin the N in DNS doesn't seem to be so special (though, I should admit, I am not an expert on Lombardic script). So, my vote is for Edward II (1307 -1327). Here are the classes of his pennies:  If you pay attention to the legend rather than the effigy, class 11C is the winner - the rest of them have an extra R: EDWA RR ANGL etc.The effigy is closer to class 11A, or could it be 11B which was minted in Canterbury but not shown here? So, if it is Edward II penny class 11 then it was minted between 1310 and 1314 in Canterbury, and its value for a VG grade (the lowest in the catalog) is about £22.
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
35 Posts |
thats great. thankyou once again for your help I appreciate it.i have ordered spinks book so that will be usefull.going again this weekend we have around 7 other fields to scan. so hopefully they will yeild some interesting finds. the actual fields were where oliver cromwell had a battle in 1648 so you never know.battle of st fagans.
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
14 Posts |
I believe the Elizabeth I coin to be a threepence, rather than a sixpence. If so, then it is Spink 2566. Value would be about £15-£20 in that condition, in my opinion.
Kindest Regards,
Clive.
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
14 Posts |
Looking at the posts before, the date is not 1561 but, rather, 1568.
Hope this helps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2605 Posts |
If its diameter is 19 mm it's 3 pence, if it is 26 mm then it's 6 pence. dazzer71 would have to chime in on that issue. I do agree with HistoricCoinage on the date, and here's something else I found: "Some dates on Elizabeth I sixpence, in particular 1568/1567, are overdates." Now, look at that coin and tell me it wasn't originally '67 die changed to '68.
Edited by svslav 11/09/2009 5:30 pm
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
35 Posts |
yeah its deffinately 26" diameter. I thought the 8 looked a bit weired , it could very well be over dated. for what reason would that have been done?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2605 Posts |
To avoid the expense of making a new die they just alter the die from the previous year. Sometimes the engravers do a pretty crude job.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 5,010 |
|