| Author |
Replies: 29 / Views: 5,608 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
60 Posts |
One just soaked for 3 days, 1917P I believe. I was just curious to see what it was. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1409 Posts |
Thanks to weersteve for chiming in. I only soak the mint mark having nickles too. I ended up with two more 1915-S mints after another 48 hrs of soaking.
For this lot of 100 buffs, I paid an average of $.23 per coin, and 59 of them had mint marks which was really high compared to most lots I've bought. I also ended up with a few type 1's.
I've never tried nic-a-date, but will test it on some non-mint mark examples until I'm confident I can do it without jacking up the others.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1409 Posts |
Oh - and weersteve - I also got a "two-feathers" dateless, and didn't soak it because I wanted to ask if I should or not. Thoughts?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1291 Posts |
afcop13 - There are LOTS of years and MM combinations in the Buffalo series that had two feather varieties. I am not aware of any that are prized or highly sought after or particularly valuable as compared to the normal 3 feather coin, but this is not really my area of expertise. At any rate, if it doesn't have a date and it doesn't have obverse doubling and the buffalo has all 4 legs you're safe restoring it whether it has 2 or 3 feathers. (My comment about 4 legs is not meant to indicate concern for ruining a 1937-D 3 legger. I don't think the date ever wore off of a 1937-D. My comment was actually directed to the 1917-D 3-and-a-half leg variety. Got a dateless "D" mint nickel with only 3-and-a-half legs? Probably a 1917!)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1409 Posts |
Thanks for answering.
I have an S mint that was dateless, and the last two digits started to come thru under 20x magnification, and I think it "could" be a 1918/7. Too weak to tell - I'm hoping a few days of soaking will help more.
BTW - I've looked at your restorations - amazing. I'm just trying to fill some holes until I can afford the "real deals" (unrestored). But I'm not adverse to making a few bucks off found key dates either!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1291 Posts |
If it's an "S" mint it WON'T be an 18/7. Those only came in the flavor of "D".
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1409 Posts |
LOL - duh - I'll scratch that one, and wait for the D mint bucket for a couple more days. LOL.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1397 Posts |
Well I have soaked my 4 test nickels for over a week now and I definitely have a 1914 and a 1919. One still has no date at all and I think the other is going to be a 1917.
I got the nic-a-date in the mail yesterday and have been experimenting with it. I have tried putting it on the coins and I have tried soaking them in a small amount of it.
I don't know how long to soak them, but I gave them about 20 minutes and then washed them. I swear they look worse. Still can't really see the date on one. And one side of one coin is seriously brown now.
I threw them back in the vinegar again. So far I don't think I have been doing much positive with them. Should I have soaked them longer than 20 minutes in the nic-a-date?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1291 Posts |
Good grief. I'm surprised you have any nickel left at all. Nic-a-date is not meant to sit on the coin for more than 30 or 45 seconds, tops. And it has the word "date" in it's name for a reason. It was never meant to be a "one product does all" sort of option.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2424 Posts |
dangit. I hope one of you bought my dateless buffs in an auction here not long ago. if so I'm eager to see what you got! I was kicking myself after I sold them becuase of all the restoring that could be done... o well. off to my dealers junk bin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1397 Posts |
OK I have done some further test coins with no mint mark or date because I don't want to practice on the ones with mint marks. First one is a 1914 P naturally. I'm getting a little bit better. The key was knowing how fast the nic-a-date works.  *note to self, don't leave it on 20 minutes*  
|
|
Valued Member
United States
408 Posts |
That looks nice. You are getting there. Perhaps "practice makes perfect?"
Edited by tampabaygrampa 08/05/2010 06:01 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
958 Posts |
id say do all nickles even the no mint mark nickles if you pick through and only do the S and D mint marks thats fine your looking for key dates cant blame you but a 1914 no mint mark values the same as a 31s ,24s,26s,its higher in value/equal any nickle from 1919-1937 ( any mint mark )
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1291 Posts |
Nickelman - Not too shabby! Throw it in some jewelry cleaner for 24 hours and a lot of that dark, streaky discoloration should go away.
(Note: To those who are reading my comment and thinking, "Aughh! Cleaning it is BAD!!", I'd like to remind you that cleaning it is the LEAST of what has already been done to it! It had no date, ergo it was basically worthless. Now that Nickelman has discovered that it is a 1914 it has some potential value and collectability. If he gets rid of some of the discoloration, it will be even better)
|
| |
Replies: 29 / Views: 5,608 |