| Author |
 Replies: 26 / Views: 4,423 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
321 Posts |
Stunet- The maximum I can zoom and remain in focus is 2.7x from roughly 12 inches from the subject and yes, that is in macro. Its unfortunate but good enough. My parents have a sony SLR that I've been playing with. Custom settings are much more flexible than my point and shoot and the macro is phenomenal but I have not been able to get the right color balance yet. Waredu- lol ya I decided to use that picture to add some life to the photo. literally.  |
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote:
Its unfortunate but good enough. Good enough? News flash: You're already there, and won't do much better with $2000 worth of equipment. Play with the dSLR, and then spend the money on more shiny objects to put under the lens you already own.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
Dave- Ya I noticed that the results are pretty similar between the 2 cameras I added sharpness and contrast to the picture as suggested and a little saturation to give the rim toning a favorable bump  |
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
Anyone reading this should do the following-
Open up both close up morgan shots I have in separate windows, make both windows full screen, then alternate between the two. Awesome comparison and testament to the capabilities of editing.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
300 Posts |
Nice Pic  |
|
Valued Member
United States
487 Posts |
Starting to build a similar set up mattbrowning7 gave me the layout too. I see that mattbrowning7 set up is open to the back maybe to take advantage of the light bouncing off the off white wall. I believe I will modify my set up by stapling white canvas to the back for better lighting, all my walls in the house are mostly primary colors.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
if you change your little bucket to a cut up plastic gallon milk container you mighty get better light diffusion... maybe super dave would chime in on this?
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
Quote:
if you change your little bucket to a cut up plastic gallon milk container you mighty get better light diffusion... maybe super dave would chime in on this? Although I've seen folks get pretty good results using diffused light, I don't use it. It's far easier for me to get the actual color and (more importantly) luster of a coin using direct lighting. |
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
I agree with Dave, although I have since taken better shots of this coin with less dark spots, I think its important to show luster and have some strong contrast but I'll try the milk carton-sounds fun, thanks for the suggestion.
Edited by mattbrowning7
08/25/2010 10:26 am
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
It's worth a shot, Matt. I personally prefer the light-dark contrasts shown in your '84 shots. Although one goal for me is to provide pics which the forum will consider good, in the end analysis I'm creating stuff I personally think is pretty. I like the look I'm getting, and y'all don't complain. |
|
New Member
United States
33 Posts |
nice little set up you got there, thanks for sharing and giving me some ideas
|
| |
Replies: 26 / Views: 4,423 |
First Page
Posted 07/30/2010 11:51 am
