| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,389 |
|
Valued Member
Canada
311 Posts |
I am not a penny expert, but my eyes show that there is a large and small date. Is there such a thing? The one on the left is worn slightly more, but all the imprints on the left are larger, I think. Could I get some feedback please?  
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
367 Posts |
the date on the left is more worn, so it has flatened out, it makes it look bigger.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9864 Posts |
 In this case it's just wear
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9162 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
311 Posts |
Thank you, I thought I might have had something.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
304 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
367 Posts |
That's the word!
Edited by cazzuey 12/20/2010 8:05 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
221 Posts |
Here's another smooched cent I got in a roll a few days ago  
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
311 Posts |
thank you for your comments and photos, I appreciate you assistance.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
44fn... two differrnt pictures.... can not compare............... images have to be taken under the exact same conditions..... these are not!!
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
367 Posts |
I think his picture is fine, just to show a quick example.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
221 Posts |
This may a little better  
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
250 Posts |
The one on the right looks like it was placed in a vice and squished. or hammered. I can't tell in this photo, is there similar damage to the rim?
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
221 Posts |
There's no obvious damage to the rim back or front I think it's just another carefully hammered blunt coin
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
221 Posts |
I will take some more pics tomorrow
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
221 Posts |
Here's more pics    So you can see there is no damage to the rim except for common nicks  Could use some more oppions  Thanks in advance 
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,389 |