| Author |
Replies: 140 / Views: 49,949 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
OK, I'll answer questions as they come up below...Ray
"Thanks for your feedback on my own thread, Ray but actually, I've been following this one with interest from the beginning. Was hoping for more feedback to help explain your hardware since I'm at the "Camera for Dummies 101" level. Didn't want to ask any dumb questions but since no one else has, guess I'll jump in. Firstly, just what the heck is a bellows? I can see it in your set-up foto but is it part of the camera? What exactly does it do/accomplish?"
A bellows adjusts the length between camera and lens. This is the same concept as focusing a normal lens, it's just done a little differently. The longer the "throw" on the bellows, the closer an object will focus to the lens so the bigger it appears.
"Secondly, where's the camera? I can see a lens (what looks like one) sticking out the bottom there and something that looks like a lens cover on top."
No camera is shown. You would attach your own DSLR to this where the lens cover is. You can mount pretty much any camera with correct adapter.
"I really like the look of that Bausch & Lomb Stereozoom "A" stand. Reading through your posts, I "think" it can be used to mount any DSLR camera without modifications? Just looking at the photo, it appears to be tabletop. (I'm thinking of available space I have). What are the maximum/minimum extension heights on it? It looks like precision personified."
Yes, they are really nice microscope stands. But the factory stand won't mount a camera. It comes with a hoop-looking mount for a stereo microscope head or pod. I removed the hoop, and replaced it with a vertical mount that a camera or bellows can mount to. It only takes up 6"x8" on tabletop. Heights depend on the length of the vertical mount, which I can make any length.
"Lastly, those goosenecks look very versatile/adjustable. I use goosenecks myself but they don't look nearly that exotic. What sort of light do they provide?"
Those are LED gooseneck lamps from IKEA. Model is "Jansjo". Around Xmas time they had a sale and I bought a bunch. They might still have the sale going. They are very bright, though as you can see I'm putting them fairly close to the coin in the setup. Plenty bright for macro purposes, and very "flexible".
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
Forgot to say I'll be out of town til Saturday and will try to answer any questions but I may be slow in responding...Ray
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
I'm back in town and have put together another setup, this time with a Nikon 105mm lens on a Pentax Auto-bellows. Here is the setup:  Here is an overall view of the same Morgan dollar from before:  Here is a higher magnification view (with setup as shown in the first picture):  And here is a pic of a slabbed coin (sorry, did not polish slab)  Questions and comments welcomed. I'm still refining the setups so all constructive inputs are appreciated.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: I'm still refining the setups so all constructive inputs are appreciated. Nothing in my experience gives me the ability to offer a suggestion which could improve what you're showing here.  The only words I can offer: You're running into the same wall (in my opinion) that I have with a nice, dedicated macro lens - the images are beautiful, but not quite enough. The highest-magnification images, about the same as my best with the 100mm Macro, are wonderful to look at but not really more informative than larger whole-face pics. More magnification is necessary, and I'm exploring both camera-lens-based and microscope-based solutions. Is there anything in your direction which could, say, double the magnification without loss of quality? We have the advantage of being able to throw stupid amounts of lighting on the task, so effective aperture is only relevant in the sense of diffraction, and I'm curious if a setup using bellows/reversing ring (or something) might achieve the 5x-ish number I'm looking for as capably as the $1000+ lens I'm contemplating.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
SuperDave...Well, if it's higher mag you want... The bigger problem with bellows setups is lower mags, especially for shorter lenses. There is a definite range of lengths that work best for full-size coin photos. But with a short lens and long extension, high mags are easy. Here is the last pictured setup with a 35mm macro lens instead of the 100mm. First pic is the LOWEST magnification I can achieve, and second pic is the HIGHEST. I have not calculated the mag but it should be in excess of 5:1 at the sensor.   Is this what you are looking for? These are single shots taken at f/8. I could get an even better result by opening the aperture to 5.6, or 4.0, and stacking a few shots at different focal planes, but even a single image has pretty good resolution and DOF.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Hhmmmm....so if I were to invest in the purchase of a bellows which provided for the longer extensions I'd be able to get the high magnification using my 18-55mm lens? Basically I'm trying to get a true 1:1 magnification ratio without having to invest in a new (or used) high-priced lens. I can get close right now but no cigar. I doubt I'd often have the need for super macros as shown in your last foto (but I would like to have the option) and at least be able to get the full-face coin shot at 1:1 which will give me the detail and clarity I'm looking for.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
If your 18-55mm lens is old enough to have a manual aperture ring, it might work. Your focus will of course be manual as well. I'd recommend just getting a cheap lens along with the bellows. You'll probably get overall better results even at 1:1 this way. You can get a nice bellows/lens combo for under $200, and probably an acceptable one for under $100.
Edited by rmpsrpms 05/11/2011 8:46 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
That is some silly magnification, rmpsrpms.  It becomes relevant to doubling/tripling verification, which is what we're aiming at here. The DOF is far better than I expected, but you'd still want to z-stack for clarity. You're rack-focusing, right?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
SuperDave...Pics were taken with the same setup. I just replaced the lens with a 35mm. I extended the bellows to its max extension, then adjusted the stand for focus. It's critical at these mags to have a rigid stand, and this setup does the job well. Maybe later today I'll do a focus stack to show everyone what can be achieved with that method, or at least the best I can do with this setup. Some folks use an automated focusing rack for taking the stack shots, allowing them to do a large number of evenly-spaced shots, but I'll just do a few shots (likely 3-5) focused manually with the stand...Ray
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
Here is an example of image stacking. Same Morgan dollar, same Macro Setup with 35mm lens. I took 3 photos, one focused on topmost features of the date, one focused for best top to bottom balance, and one focused on surface of the coin. For these pictures I opened the aperture to f/5.6 (previous pic was at f/8). I tried f/4 but the sharpness was not as good. Here is focus on topmost features:  Here is focus on middle features:  Here is focus on surface features:  And finally, the Focus Stacked image: 
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
Edited by rmpsrpms 05/13/2011 10:47 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
Sidekick-CA...I put together an "el-cheapo" setup as an example to show you don't have to spend a lot to get decent quality. The pics below are taken with an Asahi Pentax single-rail bellows that you can pick up for <$50 on ebay, and a Vivitar 75mm LU enlarging lens that usually go for <$30 on ebay. You will need an adapter for your camera, M42 to Canon IIRC, probably another $10. No stand, so you will need to mount this to your copy stand where your camera would mount, or to a tripod. This combo can go from around 1:2 to 2:1 magnification. Here are pics of that same Dollar at 1:1 and at 2:1...  
Edited by rmpsrpms 05/13/2011 10:46 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Thanks for that info Ray. And great pix you're getting with the el cheapo set-up. Sounds like just what the doctor ordered but I think the first order of business for me is getting a decent copy stand. The one I have now is very basic--height adjustment is made by releasing a clamp and then manually adjusting. The process is kinda jerky and getting the height exactly where I want it is hit and miss and imprecise to say the least. Received my macro extension tube yesterday and haven't come up for air yet trying various set-ups. The results are "fairly" good but it's a bugger getting focused. With the rings in place I no longer have AF and no f/stop control, not even on the camera itself (I'm shooting with camera tethered and I can normally adjust f/stop from the computer) so I assume that lack of control is due to loss of some sort of electrical connection with the rings being placed between the camera and lens. Another problem I've having with the copy stand is even when it's fully extended, I can't get the entire coin in even if I'm only using one of the 3 rings in the extension tube. I'm talking about Morgans which is what I normally shoot. Smaller coins are no problem. I managed to find a Canon single rail bellows on the web for about $40 and there were several Vivitar 75mm LU enlarging lenses on ebay but I'm going to hold off on those until I can get on track with a decent copy stand. This one is with all 3 rings  This is only 1 ring and as close as I could get to having the full face 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
You're probably losing focus in the peripheries because the lens was not designed for flat field work. On top of this, the lack of aperture control (I assume aperture is wide)is a two-fold problem: first, poor depth of field so any lens field flatness issues are amplified; and second, aberrations that could normally be avoided with a smaller aperture are not removed. Metering won't help this, now will manual focus. You will probably need to figure out how to stop the lens down or use another one.
The copy stand looks fine. It looks like you'll be able to mount a bellows to it, no problem. I am not sure how rigid it is but it is probably OK for Dollar size shots. May not be rigid enough for higher-mag shots, though.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
The meta data on those 2 pix of mine say f/0. I don't think I can do anything about that with the extension tube in there. And buying an expensive lens is what I'm trying to avoid. Your el cheapo example sounds like a good work-around though. If I get that Vivitar enlarging lens will that fit right on the camera body as long as I get the adapter? If so I should get my f/stop control back. Got a note back from the seller of the copy stand I'm looking at and he says "If it (bellows) has a standard tripod mount, most likely it'll work with this stand".
|
| |
Replies: 140 / Views: 49,949 |