Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1967 Centennial Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 5,623Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
hadleydog's Avatar
Canada
1267 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2006  12:31 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add hadleydog to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Since the time they came out, one of my favourite series ever!
Bought a couple of sets in the veleteen (or whatever) case, and they have picked up some really cool toning! What do you guys think?
1967-Centennial-Coins 1967-Centennial-Coins
1967-Centennial-Coins

Image: 1967-Centennial-Coins 67dollarrev1.jpg
31.73�KB

Image: 1967-Centennial-Coins 67halfrev1.jpg
36.86�KB

Image: 1967-Centennial-Coins 67quarterrev1.jpg
41.38�KB
Edited by hadleydog
10/28/2006 12:33 am
Pillar of the Community
AuldFartte's Avatar
United States
830 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2006  10:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add AuldFartte to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The '67s get some of the nicest toning I've seen on Canadian coins, with the exception of the early '70s proof dollars. Yours look beautiful!!!
Pillar of the Community
scoutjim99's Avatar
United States
4589 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2006  3:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add scoutjim99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ilove the toning on those . Its is so even
Pillar of the Community
Irishraider's Avatar
United States
1454 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2006  3:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Irishraider to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Really like those hadleydog. They did pick up some nice coloring. I love Canadian coins, they have some of the nicest ones.
Pillar of the Community
sn31's Avatar
United States
773 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2006  4:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sn31 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very nice!!
:) sn31.
Rest in Peace
Gary Burke's Avatar
United States
3730 Posts
 Posted 11/19/2006  03:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Gary Burke to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice looking coins, even though I'm not into toning.

I bought a roll of each denomination in 1967, and they continue to reside in my safety deposit box.

I'm sure there's not much value to them, but I really like them and plan to give them to kids and grandkids.
New Member
LlacerSBD's Avatar
Spain
40 Posts
 Posted 12/27/2006  5:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add LlacerSBD to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hello
I'm from Barcelona Spain, and I have only two ways for information abaut Canadian coins, The Krause World Coins and this forum.

Over this quarter 1967 centennial coin, on the Krause, indicates two types:
KM#68 0.8000 Silver
KM#68a 0.5000 Silver

I have two coins, and they seem diferent. But my problem is how to clasify.

Please, do you know how to do it?
Thanks Joan
Valued Member
bromac's Avatar
Canada
195 Posts
 Posted 12/27/2006  6:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bromac to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've seen people give ways to tell the difference but I can't. The Charlton catalogue says "the two varieties are not disinguishable by appearance".

I know lots of people like it but for me toning is tarnish.

Bill
Edited by bromac
01/08/2007 3:07 pm
Pillar of the Community
hadleydog's Avatar
Canada
1267 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2007  2:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hadleydog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Originally posted by bromac


I know lots of people like it but for me toning is tarnish.
Bill


That's cool with me. In fact, if you have any tarnished coins you'd like to get rid of, send them down my way and I'll send ya back some nice shiney white ones!
Pillar of the Community
Irishraider's Avatar
United States
1454 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2007  6:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Irishraider to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Originally posted by LlacerSBD

Hello
I'm from Barcelona Spain, and I have only two ways for information abaut Canadian coins, The Krause World Coins and this forum.

Over this quarter 1967 centennial coin, on the Krause, indicates two types:
KM#68 0.8000 Silver
KM#68a 0.5000 Silver

I have two coins, and they seem diferent. But my problem is how to clasify.

Please, do you know how to do it?
Thanks Joan



Joan,

The only way to tell is by weight. You would need a small digital scale that measures in grams.

The .800 silver quarter should weigh approximately 5.83 grams.
The .500 silver quarter should weigh approximately 5.05 grams.

Hope this helps.

Valued Member
bromac's Avatar
Canada
195 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2007  11:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bromac to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have to go back again to Charlton. They say the .500 and .800 are not distinguishable. The 5.07 gram coin is the nickel coin and not one of the silvers.

Bill
Valued Member
fastfords1's Avatar
United States
179 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2007  10:06 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fastfords1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
with Bromac...My reading of Charlton also does not show a differentiation by weight, and no other means is mentioned.
If you had a lot of samples, I'm quite sure they would "ring" differently. Of course if you have Unc coins, that would not be an adviseable test.
Does anyone else have information on the "preferred or acceptable" way to differentiate these coins?
Pillar of the Community
Irishraider's Avatar
United States
1454 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2007  5:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Irishraider to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Originally posted by Irishraider

quote:
Originally posted by LlacerSBD

Hello
I'm from Barcelona Spain, and I have only two ways for information abaut Canadian coins, The Krause World Coins and this forum.

Over this quarter 1967 centennial coin, on the Krause, indicates two types:
KM#68 0.8000 Silver
KM#68a 0.5000 Silver

I have two coins, and they seem diferent. But my problem is how to clasify.

Please, do you know how to do it?
Thanks Joan



Joan,

The only way to tell is by weight. You would need a small digital scale that measures in grams.

The .800 silver quarter should weigh approximately 5.83 grams.
The .500 silver quarter should weigh approximately 5.05 grams.

Hope this helps.





Sorry all. I found it through Google last night and can't remember the website. I have been looking for it again and if I find it I will post a link to it.


OK, this looks like it. Now I may have misspoke and perhaps confused myself.

http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art26240.asp

When you look at the dates it has 1967 twice and it matched up with the question asked. However, I am not a Canadian coin expert but I do have a little collection of them.

Next time I will be sure to post a link to any info I find.

Edited by Irishraider
01/09/2007 6:01 pm
Valued Member
bromac's Avatar
Canada
195 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2007  7:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bromac to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You did repeat the information correctly but it is at odds with Charlton.In my opinion Charlton is the more authoritative reference.

I hate to seem like I'm dwelling on this but it's an interesting question and it actually comes up rather frequently.I have a 1967 quarter that is certified by the very respected ( in Canada for Canadian coins ) grading company ICCS and they haven't indicated .800 or .500 in their comments. I would think that if there was an easy way to tell that they would have done that.

It is possible that the only way to tell the difference would involve destroying the coin


Bill
Edited by bromac
01/09/2007 7:12 pm
Valued Member
Canada
61 Posts
 Posted 01/20/2007  11:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bboudrot to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I got a centennial penny as change at the Post Office today
(Canada to US Stamps cost 99 cents (with tax) here now)

http://ca.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bb....jpg&.src=ph
Edited by bboudrot
01/20/2007 11:13 pm
Valued Member
bromac's Avatar
Canada
195 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2007  1:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bromac to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I just found some more information on the question of telling the difference between .500 and .800 silver.
A coin dealer has responded to the question in the Candian Numismatic Association electronic bulletin. He says when buying 1967 10¢ and 25¢ dealers assume an equal mix of 50% and 80% and that the only way to tell the difference is to refine the silver. Here is someone with years of experience and a financial interest and he says there is no way to tell the difference.

Bill
  Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 5,623Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums