| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,410 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
207 Posts |
Ok Guys thanks. For some reason I was thinking it was something different.
Class dismissed.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
the capped busts that have a reeded edge just looks somehow different overall for some reason.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
861 Posts |
Capped Bust Halves were produced using the Screw Press until 1836. At the end of 1836, the mint issued 1,200 new Capped Bust Halves that were minted using the new Steam Press. The steam press used much greater pressure and led to a much more even and stronger strike:   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote:
he capped busts that have a reeded edge just looks somehow different overall for some reason. That's because they did modify the design on the reeded edge halves. |
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
thanks Conder101... I was wondering if that was the case!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
To me a 36 to 39 reeded edge half dollar,has little different design and is smaller size. Capped bust half is 32.5mm, the reeded is 30mm.
The capped bust has smooth with lettered edge. With the letters, "50 cents or half dollar"
Starting mid year 1836, a reeded edge was added. Pretty much like the edge of the current half dollar today.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
It is definitely a different design. Similar but I could pick them out easily without the date or size differences being obvious. If you check my 7070 pictures you can see them side by side.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
168 Posts |
The number given for the mintage of the 1836 RE half dollar is absolute conjecture made up by Walter Breen. He did his best to reckon what he thought was realistic, but my analysis of the true mintage strongly favors 25,000 or more minted that year. Breen went with the total mintage for 1836, which included the CBHs made that year, then guessed how many were RE half dollars. I go into great detail in the book that Dick Graham and I wrote on the series. Below are images of the both accepted subtypes of RE half dollars. They are the "50 CENTS" reverse of 1836-1837 and "HALF DOL." reverse of 1838-1839.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
861 Posts |
According to RedBook, Coinfacts, Heritage, CoinWeek and all other known major publications, the mintage for the 1836 Reeded Edge Half Dollar was 1,200: http://www.coinfacts.com/half_dolla...arieties.htmhttp://coinmintages.com/capped-bust...ge/#more-155http://www.coinweek.com/us-type-coi...r-1836-1839/While it is true that the mintage may be +/-300, there is no possiblity of it being any more than that. The steam press was not set up for minting until the end of the year and the 1836 reeded edge was more of a pattern coin. It was actually minted after production for the year had ended. The so-clled official mintage is actually 5,000, but, most of that 5,000 were part of the 1837 reeded mintage as they changed the date midstream. For that reaso, it is estimated that of those 5,000; 1,200 were minted with the 1836 date and 3,800 were minted with the 1837 date |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1704 Posts |
g048406 and Tom B those are some beautiful half dollars.  Ed ANA LM-3175 |
|
Pillar of the Community
861 Posts |
Thanks Gyrene7483...I think TomB's 1838 is much nicer looking than mine, but, the 1836 is the only reeded I have right now. Alot of people think the reeded edges don't have the 'charm' of the earlier CBH's-end of an era kind of thing.......But, I think the reeded edges in high grade with nice toning are the prettiest coins ever..JMO
|
|
Valued Member
United States
168 Posts |
Sadly, the mintage number of 1,200 is more fantasy than reality. As is often the case, publications quote one another and errors are wildly propagated. Breen gave it his shot at 1,200 and this number was picked up as fact by the resources you have listed. They are all wrong. The question is what was the true mintage. Get a copy of the Reeded Edge half dollar book that Dick Graham and I published this past year and you will see a detailed analysis of how many we believe were struck. We are not the only ones who believe that the number is approximately 25,000. Indeed, no one who studies this field has given us any indication that they do not agree with the revised mintage figure.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
153 Posts |
Walter Breen was a fraud, a convicted child molester..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
861 Posts |
"Walter Breen was a fraud, a convicted child molester."
I heard the same thing. Too bad we can't erase that degenerate from the coin industry.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote:
Walter Breen was a fraud, a convicted child molester No argument that he was a child molester, defend the fraud part of the statement. Yes some of his "facts" are not true. but can you show that these facts were made up with fraudulent intent? Quote:
I heard the same thing. Too bad we can't erase that degenerate from the coin industry. I've heard that sentiment expressed many times, but the coin hobby would be a much worse off if we did. For all the "made up" facts he is accused of, there would be a tremendous amount of other knowledge that we would not have if it wasn't for his work. The problem is most people can't separate the child molestation problem from everything else. Edited by Conder101
01/14/2013 1:40 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,410 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 01/10/2013 1:59 pm
