| Author |
Replies: 22 / Views: 4,550 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Formerly nancyc
Australia
5385 Posts |
Great clash! It's a beauty! 
life is a mystery to be lived not a problem to be solved
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Very nice strong die clash, but it isn't a variety, just a die stage.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
457 Posts |
Not only that, you should check for FSB. It looks like it may qualify for it from that picture but I'd need to look under a magnifier for sure. Cool coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Wow--I can almost hear that clash from here! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2824 Posts |
thanks for the comments, do you think its worth sending in to TPG to get slabbed
|
|
Valued Member
United States
450 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2824 Posts |
Edited by OcalaFlorida 11/03/2014 10:34 pm
|
|
Valued Member
440 Posts |
WOW Congrats that is a neat clasher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1374 Posts |
I just wanted to chime in again on this coin. I was reading Kevin Flynn's book on clashing (the big purple one), and in it he has a spectacular photo of a clashed Kennedy half in proof. Those dies had clashed to such a great degree that clashing was found inside the devices, like Kennedy's cheek. This occurred because the face of the dies bulged out in the center and 'kissed' under the fantastic force of the press. It reminded me of this Mercury dime, and now that I'm looking at it again, there appears to be clashing inside of Liberty's eye. I suspect that this coin came off of a press whose pressure had been raised to strike proofs - or it had been inaccurately set too high. IMO, this clashing could not have occurred with the standard press pressure. If I'm not mistaken, circulation IHCs took 60 tons of pressure while proofs were struck at something like 200 tons. So, the difference in pressure is quite high.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2824 Posts |
Drsandman2, thanks great info yes the clash goes into neck, eye and nose 
Edited by OcalaFlorida 11/19/2014 9:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1374 Posts |
Okay, I did some more research. In the Authoritative Reference on Lincoln Cents by Wexler and Flynn, they say that no proof coins were struck between 1917 and 1935. If I am not mistaken, the proofs were made again starting in 1936. Proofs in this period were struck using a hydraulic press operating between 300 and 400 tons psi. Business strikes were struck on conventional presses at about 60 tons, 5-6 times less pressure. No proofs were struck in 1917, although a single Lincoln Cent has drawn controversy as being a possible proof. It seems plausible that in 1917 they started using the hydraulic presses for business strikes since the mint stopped making proof coins. I know nothing about these presses, but it seems possible that they could have been used without reducing the PSI, or not reducing it enough. This theory could be used to help explain why the clashing on your coin is so outrageous, and why that 1917 cent looks so proof-like. Cheers.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
That is just "silly clashes" what a variety!
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
WOW! WOW! How can I missed!
Excellent!! I think the bottom band miss being FSB.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
 GREAT coin! Certainly worthy of maddieclashes!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
VERY cool!! Congrats on a great pickup! 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 4,550 |
Page 2 of 2
|