| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 1,915 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1566 Posts |
A little bit smaller than a half dollar.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Am I close at F12? Possibly a couple of small issues with scratches on obverse, and minor corrosion on reverse. Am I being too strict?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
110 Posts |
Ok so aproxamately the size of a British half penny. That makes it the largest US penny known right?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
1852 Posts |
Lets see - I am going with VF20 with a minor deduction for tiny scratches front of bust. Otherwise nice, hard surfaces for net F12 to F15.
Nice coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3167 Posts |
I would say F-15. Nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16681 Posts |
The surfaces appear glossy from the photos. Appears lacquered.
Does it look like this in hand? Could just be the lighting.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
Lacquer would be a good thing anyway. How better to preserve a coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
I had just soaked it in Verdi-Care. It dried for about an hour before I took the pic.
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
Hmmm. Verdi-Care doesn't "shine" a coin but lighting can on surfaces smoothed from circulation. No doubt this is a lovely original piece either way.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
At your suggestion I'll give it a soak in acetone. Can't hurt.
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
To my mind it doesn't really matter. Lacquer is benign and near-impervious on a coin, and easily removable by methods nobody considers intrusive. Were I to buy a known-lacquered coin I wouldn't touch it. The only consideration is a lacquered coin which then circulated; any surfaces worn clean would age at a different rate than those still lacquered.
I've never done the job, but I'd think removal of a lacquer coating 150+ years old would take time and multiple soaks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
I'll leave it then. I've already have an 1812 soaking tying to remove heavy verdigris anyway.
|
|
Moderator
United States
16681 Posts |
For the record, I have 2 LC's in my 7099 that are lacquered.
I think they are quite attractive actually :-)
Lacquered corroded classic copper looks better IMHO than those that aren't.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,915 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/13/2015 9:13 pm
