| Author |
Replies: 48 / Views: 3,282 |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
@ Moxking I looked at the two images. Here is what I see: Original  Moxking's  My notes  Here is certified example showing your "Fatty Letters"  It's ironic how you are calling this a cast fake when there is "too much" detail when cast fakes are isually associated with a loss of minute detail. Also, explain to me why there isn't any major bubbling in any other part of the coin other that the letter areas, which tend to be an area for die cracks due to metallurgical physics. Also, you say that there are 18 different reverse dies known for this date and mint. You showed us one, which would naturally be different from the other 17, especially in a later die state.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Looks like a cleaned common date with XF detail. A $70 coin retail.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
A lot of these issues can be immediately resolved with proper photography. Absent proper photography, this coin is cleaned. The obverse looks scratched. The reverse looks tooled. XF details.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
Being that this coin is a common date has little bearing on whether it is counterfeit or not. There have been many past examples posted about on this board of inexpensive coins being faked.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Hey Typecoin,
I think you are confusing what someone else said about too much detail. It's not something I said, although I may have referenced that opinion.
Look at the mess around around the claws, the shield, the arrow heads, shafts, and feathers. That's not die cracks. That's not die clash. So when you ask for me to point out other areas of concern besides the legend - there you go.
The denticles alone without ANY other examination could not possibly be from ANY die shift or crack. Those denticles, (as I've mentioned several times) just left of the tip of the left wing and just right of the CA in AMERICA all by themselves show that this could not occur with a struck coin.
In fact, if you want to discuss irony, you might note that the yellow circle you placed around the denticles to the right of the arrows displays one of those two areas of concern. Mating denticles producing little baby denticle tips below them.
I have no clue why you believe that mint luster or halo effects around the letters or protected areas indicate this is a real mint product.
Last, the reason that I mentioned that there are 18 different reverse dies when I displayed the one I own was so that there could be no misunderstanding that by showing only one reverse that it proved anything. Only that it was an example to compare to. Not that it was the same die. That's why I said it. So no one would think I believed one example proved anything about the other 17 die types known.
What we need is either photos of the edge of this coin or the weight of the coin, or even, if nothing else, as has been suggested many times - better photos.
Until then, I can't convince you that what you call die cracks are not, nor can you convince me that those are in fact die cracks OR die clash.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Absolutely correct. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I mean, correct that we need the weight and better photos. I still don't believe it's a fake.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
Looks real IMO just cleaned/scratched
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
59 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
To Typecoin and all others. These new photos prove, without a shadow of doubt that this not only real, but very pretty. I can't really tell if this is cleaned and returned, but it remains a very nice example.
This might be the reverse that was mentioned as having the rust influenced die.
In any event I will admit my adiment error in believing this to be counterfeit and I apologize for any offense.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I still say cleaned, but it retoned quite nicely.  @moxking No hard feelings.  I was just trying to prove my point using the evidence available, which can be used for future reference by anyone who needs it.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Thanks, Typecoin. Although ill probably have nightmares about evil denticles for some time. ...breeding evil denticles ... With long tentacles ... NOW I want to buy this coin just so I know that it's properly locked up...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I looked at the pictures again, and I believe the "extra denticles" thing is actually a result of the light reflecting off the base of the denticles or the surface of the coin in between the denticles. I don't see them in the new pictures.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
This thread seems to show that photographs are of the utmost importance when trying to grade a coin not in hand!
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
59 Posts |
Quote"Thanks, Typecoin. Although ill probably have nightmares about evil denticles for some time. ...breeding evil denticles ... With long tentacles ... NOW I want to buy this coin just so I know that it's properly locked up..."
I don't have enough posts or whatever it takes to sell yet,but it will probably still be around later.
I was pretty certain and my husband was certain that it is real. Thanks for all the comments and help!
|
|
|
Replies: 48 / Views: 3,282 |
|