| Author |
Replies: 42 / Views: 8,469 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: SsuperDdave, So I take it you are not putting away condition rarities of anything modern, even though you do see them as sleepers. I have a limited budget, and the things which do move me emotionally are dominating it. Were the money freer, I would absolutely be backing up my words with actions. A few factors interfere with a broader bullishness on my part, though. First, the NIFC issues - they're not suffering any attrition, tend to have been produced in high quality, and therefore even mintages under a million will ensure easy availability for collectors wishing to acquire a nice example into the foreseeable future. It's unreasonable to expect individual collector interest exceeding a million examples; heck, I doubt anything possibly excepting Lincolns will ever command such demand.  Circulation issues have been produced in ridiculous abundance over the last fifty years, and even factoring major attrition unless there is some sort of mass-recall/melting event in the future, they will never be "uncommon" except in the rarest of cases. However, they were produced with such casual craftsmanship - forced by the production volume - that higher-graded examples are rarities from Day One and even though more will surface into the future (some current rarities will lose their scarcity) it's still as sure a bet as can be imagined, in the broader view. I believe we're just looking at different percentages of the "bigger picture" here. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
160 Posts |
SsuperDdave, I agree, that's why I said earlier that with so many different ways to collect nowadays, which were not around 30 years ago, ones money can only go so far. You have to decide where you can get the most for your collecting dollar that you will be happy with.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
Quote: Circulation issues have been produced in ridiculous abundance over the last fifty years, and even factoring major attrition unless there is some sort of mass-recall/melting event in the future, they will never be "uncommon" except in the rarest of cases. However, they were produced with such casual craftsmanship - forced by the production volume - that higher-graded examples are rarities from Day One and even though more will surface into the future (some current rarities will lose their scarcity) it's still as sure a bet as can be imagined, in the broader view. I have some of these rarities and some I have in quantity. I have many safety deposit boxes full of what I believe are scarce and rare US and world moderns. But the scarcity of some of these coins is really far greater than most people realize. My favorite example is the '82-P quarter. If you look at the pop reports you'll come to believe this coin is common in high grade but that's not true. it's not true because the services give coins pass when they are badly struck by worn dies. If you want a true Gem then I'm not too certain even a single coin exists. I have some beauties but even my finest example was only about the 500th coin from die pair that wasn't quite perfectly adjusted. It's a full pressure strike though. I'd grade it MS-64++. To give an idea of how bad these are all the souvenir set coins are atrocious. They are poorly struck by mediocre dies. A few of these are pretty clean but there's nothing I'd grade over MS-64 but the services give some of these MS-67. There are lots of neat varieties as well and most of these will only be available in VG or F because nobody has collected these. Some are tough enough that my best is only AU or XF. Of course there are rarities and scarcities I don't have at all. I'd be happy to discuss any of my collections in the general forum. Essentially I collect most 20th century tokens and medals though I have mostly only the most common issues. I don't collect coal tokens but most everything else. The only collection that even approaches being "world class" is my telephone token collection. I have a few issues not even listed by Targonsky or Earl. I have fairly decent collections of Ind and DC transportation tokens but no rarities.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
What I wonder is if the USA stops the one Cent coin will all of them sky rocket to fantastic values?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188770 Posts |
Quote: The internet has been a Godsend since I can talk to collectors of almost everything. Agreed. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
Quote: What I wonder is if the USA stops the one Cent coin will all of them sky rocket to fantastic values? I thought getting rid o the Memorial cent would spur interest in all one cent coins and especially in the Memorial cent. This just didn't seem to happen. Abolishing the penny altogether might have more of an effect but nothing seems to change any longer. The old Washington quarter and Jefferson nickel have been discontinued with no obvious effect as well. Of course few people are aware the quarter is discontinued.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6130 Posts |
From what I have read, the LWCs were still kicking around in free circulation as late as the 70s. "Modern" (1959-2008) coins are an order of magnitude more common, and we may still see 1960s coins in circulation in the 2060s, especially if most coins spend years at a time motionless in jars and buckets. I suspect the *true* sleeper coins will be the last handful of zincolns that show neither plating bubbles nor zinc rot. That is of course, assuming that collectors in the coming decades still care about the ultra-high grades... I certainly dont. There is also a good chance that future collectors expand beyond just US coins. In recent years, certain world mint sets (particularly India) went from being junk bin items selling for a couple bucks to $500+ items at auction.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188770 Posts |
Quote:The old Washington quarter and Jefferson nickel have been discontinued with no obvious effect as well. Of course few people are aware the quarter is discontinued. The only thing that I have noticed is a huge price jump of the key date Washington quarters (1932-D and 1932-S). I bought the pair in 1997 for less than half of what just one would sell for today.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2207 Posts |
Quote: From what I have read, the LWCs were still kicking around in free circulation as late as the 70s. I started collecting in 1972, and sure, wheaties were kicking around. But they weren't as abundant as you might think. Certainly more were available then than today, but while it wasn't uncommon, it still was a thrill to find one. Obviously the frequency of that thrill has diminished markedly since then.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2207 Posts |
Just wondering if the 2009 issues could be considered sleepers, due to the relatively low mintages.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
467 Posts |
Huge fan of the 2009 mint set cents. I do believe they may be a good sleeper, but it's going to take time. I continue to buy the cents when I can get a deal and they haven't toned like so many have.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
160 Posts |
oober, I didn't realize that the 2009 satin mint set (36 coin) had a mintage of 784,614. Looks like if you are patient, you can pick them up on ebay for under $20 every so often, doesn't seem like too bad a price for what you are getting in the set. If you chose to, you could break up the set and sell everything separately and make a pretty good profit from what I can see. Very interesting, glad you brought this to my attention!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1192 Posts |
IMO 2009 is not a sleeper at all because so many hoarded them uncirculated. At best the UC set may be the rarest but they still made well over half a million which is a lot. With that said, I do enjoy the 2009 cent designs.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
160 Posts |
Wouldn't consider this a sleeper because it already has appreciated in value, but someone a while back in another thread brought up the 2015 March of Dimes set, which contained the first reverse proof silver dime ever, mintage of 74,430. I see you can still get these raw for under $50, slabbed are going for much more. But even raw, does anyone think this is a good buy at this point with such low mintage, and it seems Roosevelt dime collectors (of which there are many) would need this for their set?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
467 Posts |
I think the 2009 UC cents demand would increase once folder/album companies include these varieties in their products like the 1982 cents.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 42 / Views: 8,469 |
Page 3 of 3
|