| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,847 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
Sharper photos are needed.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say AU-55 just based on these pics. Beautiful example.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 4628 Posts |
Sorry photos were taken at night with a cellphone under artificial light.
I can assure this coin is not fake and has had provenance at least since WW2, I doubt the Chinese were faking coins that far back. The colour of it is more silvery, its the right weight and has the correct ring for silver.
Needless to say I was doubtful when I saw it initially - but now it pasts muster mainly as I usually only see very worn examples of this coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6398 Posts |
AU detail for sure. I'm not so sure about authenticity. Might just be the photo but it looks like there are raised pimples of metal on LIBERTY's leg, chest, and face. Such defects are often found on cast counterfeits.
Sharper photos would be helpful.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6514 Posts |
It's beautiful. Nice buy for the lot.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
If its real, this coin will likely pay for the majority of the lot. However, clearer pics are needed to give a grade/authenticate.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
First of all, big thanks to everyone that responded and gave a grade. But I am annoyed that some of you instantly assume its a fake. I don't have ebay or and do not trust any seller not in New Zealand. This coins was bought off a woman living in the rural areas of New Zealand, who is very sincere and be very insulted if anyone insinuated that this coin her family have had since ww2 is a fake. There are no raised pimples anyhwere and nothing suggests this coin is anything other than silver, it rings like a quarter and weights 6.22grams. How about just accepting that someone outside America actually bought a coin that was not a fake for once. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
A couple of posters have just raised some relevant questions - no one is saying this is fake. C'mon.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4472 Posts |
The coin is a 1917 D type 1. If the coin did grade AU 55, it is about a $200 USA Dollars coin. The coin may have been cleaned that would decrease the value. When I first looked at the coin my counterfeit radar also went up, but it could be your photos.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
AU.
Would like pictures in natural sunlight though.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
More photos of both sides of coin with some zoom shots . Also clearer pics . I'm leaning towards genuine .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
Best photos I could get - cellphone does not take good shots. Still convinced its a fake?   Can't make any larger as the 300kb limit is too low. It seems this page adds 10% extra KBs to every shot. That's its shadow too, its summer in New Zealand and was 31c (88f) when I took these shots. Edited by Princetane
02/21/2020 8:56 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll stay with AU-55, super example.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1361 Posts |
Coinfrog is just upset the photos don't show her toes really clear.  Nice coin for sure, great find! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
Beautiful coin! I'd venture to say perhaps AU-58. And good job on the photography!  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,847 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/19/2020 11:31 am
