Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1922 No D Lincoln Cent

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 3,000Next Topic Page 2 of 2
New Member
United States
13 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2021  7:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jjttdw to your friends list
I read through the link that CentSation posted above in a different thread and that is what let me know I know nothing. But it made me look at a coin like this

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1922-PLAIN...AOSwpMpf~3-R

and think that it doesn't add up. The twos look off. The whole In God We Trust looks hitchy as well/

Anyway, when I am ready to pull the trigger I will post it here first.

Thanks for taking the time to answer my post.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2021  7:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add merclover to your friends list
I agree. This coin is very heavily counterfeited by the Chinese, so much that no way I'd buy this cent unstabbed. If you have a nice set, it would be worth the peace of mind to buy it stabbed and break it out yourself.

to the CCF!

Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2021  7:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list
The link is to a fake, no question.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1359 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  09:04 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kloccwork419 to your friends list
Buy a slabbed one and break it out. I never considered this coin to be a variety myself, and dont want one, but there is a hole in the Dansco for it (1922 plain) To me its just an over polished die. It falls into the no initials floating roof category. What it does have going for it is the very low mintage.
I bought many and still buy slabbed coins, to break them out. I actually have a few (TOP 100 RPMs) right here in front of me that is really hard to bring myself to crack out, but I will, I think, maybe...lol. Its not a waste if its for your own personal collection. Keep the label for yourself. Weigh your options. I prefer raw coins.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
6514 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  09:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chafemasterj to your friends list

Quote:
Buy a slabbed one and break it out. I never considered this coin to be a variety myself, and dont want one, but there is a hole in the Dansco for it (1922 plain) To me its just an over polished die. It falls into the no initials floating roof category.


I agree. In my Dansco I put a blank planchet in the hole.
Check out my counterstamped Lincoln Cent collection:
http://goccf.com/t/303507
Valued Member
United States
284 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  10:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kcm to your friends list
I was pleasantly surprised when my 1922 Plain came back from PCGS at AU 58 Strong Reverse (Population 83). The long-time owner of the local coin shop assured me it was fake. I doubted anyone could pass off a fake to Ed, the long-dead and much-loved mentor and collector who sold it to me. Traumatized by learning it was fake; then re-traumatized on learning it wasn't, I figured I'd better send out a few more coins.

When Ed died, I stuck my collection (and my ability to enjoy it) in the attic -- about half a century ago, Back then, there were no slabbed coins. The best I could do for TPG participation was to staple my 2x2's to ANACS certification documents. That is to say, black and white POLAROIDS. I resumed my interest in 2017. I saw wisdom in getting some of the better pieces out of albums and slabbed. Ergo, the trips to the coin shop. I had no notion which were the "better pieces."

I posit that I was wise to forsake the albums in deference to the coins, but I didn't leave glaring holes to vex me. I wrote the PCGS or NGC serial no. and grade on an AVERY (#6737) label, slid out the upper transparent slide and stuck the label to the lower transparent slide. I'll eventually sell the collections as a whole, most probably. The buyer will know s/he can fill those slots with lower grade coins if that floats his/her boat. I hope S/he cleans off any label goo first!

This know-nothing would advise you to heed the expert advice above and invest cautiously and wisely and then do yourself and the next owner a favor by leaving the investment in its protective casket. My family name is Murphy. I know a LOT about Murphy's Law.

Kevin

New Member
United States
13 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  10:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jjttdw to your friends list
While I know it is best to leave a coin slabbed, some part of me just can't stand having an empty space in the book.

I'll have to wait to buy until a couple coins I have on ebay sell. I bought a partial set off ebay which was missing the 1922 no D and 1918 S of all things. The only coin I needed from the set was the 1914 D. Sold the 1931 S and have the 1909 S VBB and 1909 S up separately. I've already had an offer for the 1909 S VDB for $50 more than the whole set cost me to buy.

The 1910-15 S's will be listed as a group as well as a group of the semi key dates from the 20's and 30's. With any luck I recoup the set cost and have most of the money for a slabbed 1922 no D....plus the 1914 D

The crazy thing about the set I bought was that only the first 2 pages were pictured and they were terrible quality. The set also came with the rest of the pages and pages 3 & 4 were all AU or better which was an improvement from what I had.
Edited by jjttdw
01/14/2021 10:56 am
Valued Member
United States
284 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  11:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kcm to your friends list
It seems like you're having fun and you know your way around. You'll fit in well here.

Kevin
New Member
United States
13 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  2:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jjttdw to your friends list
KCM, I think you spoke too soon.

ebay has just informed me that they believe the 1909 S VDB is not genuine. I'm glad they said something before I accepted an offer. The last thing I want to do is sell something that isn't real.

Here are some pics. So was the S added or the VDB?

1922-No-D-Lincoln-Cent

1922-No-D-Lincoln-Cent
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
5686 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  2:29 pm  Show Profile   Check Zurie's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Zurie to your friends list
I agree it's likely counterfeit. The dot after the D in VDB is too close to the D, and the mint mark position isn't correct for any of the 4 known obverse dies. It might be an added S fake.
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  2:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rothery to your friends list
Any chance of getting a clear close up of the date with the Mint Mark to check location better?
Pillar of the Community
United States
1359 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  3:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kloccwork419 to your friends list
Cant tell from the pictures. Need a closeup of the date and MM. can tell you one thing. If it is real, its worth way more than a $50 offer. Why would you even consider an offer that low if you thought it was real?

Edit: I read it wrong, they offered $50 more than the whole set cost...
Edited by Kloccwork419
01/14/2021 3:43 pm
New Member
United States
13 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  3:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jjttdw to your friends list
Asked seller for credit of half the purchase price and they get the coin back. Until I found this place I had no idea people invested so much effort in fakes. I knew people removed Ds from the 1922 but had no idea people could add mint marks...VDB etc. Boy I will be sad if the other 1909 S VDB is fake too. I have no recourse on that one. Maybe I will start a different thread on that one later and keep my fingers crossed.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
6514 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  3:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chafemasterj to your friends list
@jjttdw

I know the anxiety you feel before posting a coin that you think might be counterfeit. I have an 1832 50 cent piece that I was suspicious of. I stressed for months before getting up the gumption to post it. Lucky for me it was genuine. Quite the weight off my back.
Check out my counterstamped Lincoln Cent collection:
http://goccf.com/t/303507
Edited by chafemasterj
01/14/2021 3:22 pm
Valued Member
United States
284 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2021  8:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kcm to your friends list

Quote:
KCM, I think you spoke too soon.


Alas and alack @jjttdw, I stand corrected.I spoke before something went wrong.Ignorance of the law is no excuse! to the Murphy's Law Dancehall.

I yet believe You'll do well here.

Kevin C. Murphy a.k.a. Kcm

Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 3,000Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums