| Author |
 Replies: 37 / Views: 4,182 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
584 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
338 Posts |
Here's the grade! One for regrade or cac?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6590 Posts |
I think MS-63 is to low for that coin. But I wouldn't spend the money to get it regraded.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18684 Posts |
as I said MS64 would not surprise me so if it was resent I would not expect it to come back higher than that and not worth it for a regrade
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5397 Posts |
Don't waste anymore money on grading .
These are a dime a dozen !
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not worth the cost of re-grading, even if you got a 64.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
There's a chance the scratch in front of the face (and those behind the head) were enough to bodybag it and they decided to holder it a couple points down since it's a gorgeous coin otherwise.
This coin was graded before "genuine" holders were available and before net grading was commonplace.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
It's interesting how the "value" increases in PCGS for each step from MS63 on. For NGC, the increases are also exponential but not so steep. Nevertheless, would having NGC evaluate the coin help?
Stay well,
Diy89Nurm7
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
338 Posts |
The re-grade would be more for fun than for "value", I think I'd rather try for a gold bean if I can find a dealer to submit though - again just for a bit of fun to add to the stash.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
Just would like to revive this to ask the community why they think this only received MS63? I've studied the photos and can't see much wear at all, just a few marks as mentioned by Fortcollins when he played around the contrast. I personally own different years graded MS63 that have tons more scratches and scuffs than this coin so it has me a bit confused. I'm not saying the TPG was wrong here, just wanting to know why they decided on '7 under perfect.' I'm only asking because I have recently purchased a Roll of 1881-S, and I should receive them tomorrow or Monday so I will be picking the best ones to post new threads on. They all look excellent and I'm really hoping to get MS67 out of at least one of them. But would love some tips on this specific year. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5675 Posts |
Many 81-S Morgans have PL or semi-PL surfaces that make it difficult to assess by photograph. This one has a scratch in front of the nose and some chatter in the fields that wasn't apparent in the original photos, although it still seems to be undergraded.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18684 Posts |
i had this one at MS65 possible 66 but after the 2nd set of photos I can see this no higher than MS64 and can see why they gave it MS63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
68 Posts |
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 37 / Views: 4,182 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 01/31/2021 04:50 am
