| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,055 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
407 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
549 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3237 Posts |
@vestigewolf there is a combination of DDD and MD making it harder to see, but if you look at the thickness of the devices, you should see that they have been significantly enlarged. Most notably, the spread lines are still just visible on the posts of the W in WE. The top of the G in GOD also still shows the split serif that hasn't been totally effaced by the circulation wear yet. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
Ordinarily I would be hesitant to defend a coin being a particular die based on the presence of die markers, but taken as an additional piece of supporting evidence with the points I've already made about the enlarged devices, spread lines, and split serifs, and the fact that this is a particularly prominent pair of parallel die scratches, I figured I'd also include this. The first image is my coin, second is the listing from Brian's Variety Coins (WDDO-024/DDO-007)   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Question: Why are these last images DDO? They are DDRs. On the first images, can you see that the sizes of the devices are not the same? On your images the devices are all smaller. Normal in size. The DDOs devices are wider?  As I mentioned a few days back, the devices on your coin are smaller from over polishing. Putting the normal one there shows what the differences are in width? That is what happens. When a die is polished, it it reduced in size compared with a normal coin. When there is a doubled die, the devices are enlarged either taller or wider. Edited by coop
06/21/2021 8:04 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4404 Posts |
I don't think Coop is looking past the typo Spence pointed out earlier: Quote:The DDO is the one on the bottom. Sam 100% meant the one on the top, it's pretty obvious. Coop's still thinking that the bottom one is the coin Sam thinks is a DDO. The top coin is definitely a match to DDO-007/WDDO-024, nice find! Also, Sam's last post is about the die markers for this variety which you would have understood if you read it. Edited by Tanman2001
06/21/2021 7:57 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
@Tanman thank you for clearing up the confusion! I didn't understand where the mix up with the top/bottom coin thing was coming from. Thanks for straightening this out and glad to hear you concur with my ID! Edit: @Coop sorry for not getting what you were asking earlier. I meant the "bottom" coin as in the one I stacked on the bottom when I took the side by side picture. The one on the top of the image/the bottom of the stack is the DDO. Edited by SamCoin
06/21/2021 8:17 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
@Coop does that mean you agree now that I've cleared things up? I assume you agree that the bottom of the stack/top coin of the image is the DDO since your other infographic lists it as the DDO but credits my image to Variety Vista lol Edited by SamCoin
06/21/2021 8:37 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
So this thread isn't about the 1964 DDO-007? That is what the title of the thread is?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
Not sure what you mean, Coop. This is about 1964 DDO-007. The top coin in the image (bottom coin the way I stacked them on top of each other to take the picture under my scope) is 1964 DDO-007. The bottom coin was a normal 1964 nickel I included for reference since the spread lines were hard to see.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Well the lower image is still a polished die example. Thus why I added what a normal one looks like. That was my first comment at the start of the thread. I though he was using the images from Variety Vista.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
I am the "he" who posted. Sorry, I seem to have created a lot of inadvertent confusion lol
Edited by SamCoin
06/21/2021 8:48 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Best to put put the credit on the images for copyright issues. And it you had put your name on both images, I would not have assumed it was a V.V image or a Wexler image. Having the correct names on the images prevent copyright issues and editing issues. I always add my name to an edited issue. That way all will know I edited it, and I credit the photographer as well. How convinced was I that the top image was from Variety Vista? Note the name I tagged it with?
Edited by coop
06/21/2021 8:54 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
@Coop I think you're still confused about what the image is. There were never two images. I stacked one coin on top of the other and took the picture. I thought it was obvious from the fact that the separation between the "images" was the rim of one of the coins. And figured it went without saying that if I only uploaded one set of images that they were mine.
Edited by SamCoin
06/21/2021 8:55 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,055 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/20/2021 09:36 am
