| Author |
Replies: 39 / Views: 3,444 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
449 Posts |
Quote: Get rid of the penny, nickel and quarter, change the dime, half and dollar to plated steel and reduce the size/weight of the half and dollar coins. I like that idea. Or drop the plating and just use a cheap metal/alloy that won't rust or corrode.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
I'd like to round any total over $1 to the nearest quarter, except rounding is mucked up by arcane state laws. For example, New Jersey requires sellers to round to the nearest cent when calculating sales tax, per their site https://www.state.nj.us/treasury/ta...thetax.shtml It seems reasonable to me for a seller to round and pay any sales tax difference out of his pocket, except you know someone will challenge that in court, and the outdated laws will support them.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25385 Posts |
I shudder to think of them inflicting something more abysmal than the zincoln on us. I'll stop using cash entirely at that point.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1648 Posts |
Did you get a chance to read the prior summary I put earlier in the thread that one of the potential metallic alternatives is ready for implementation just pending congressional authorization to do so? To add some more info not in there, the alternative is referenced as 80/20. The alternative is a seamless variant to the present 75 percent copper, 25 percent nickel alloy used for the 5-cent coin and as the cladding for the dime, quarter dollar, and the Kennedy half dollar, but the 80/20 uses more copper, less nickel and adds manganese. The 80/20 composition is actually 77 percent copper, 20 percent nickel and 3 percent manganese from what I read as some might want to know. Seamless means substitutions that would require little or no modification to coin-accepting equipment. So hope that is helpful info. And unfortunately they found nothing apparently that would lower the cost of the cent. @Hondo, U.S. Mint researchers identified a copper-plated steel cent as an alternative to the copper-plated zinc cent. The option would be seamless, with the same dimensions and weight as the current cent, but a different electromagnetic signature Another wildcard is that EU tags copper and nickel as strategic metals and pushing for zinc. The Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) unveiled by the European Union adds the two major industrial metals to a list that had previously focused on more niche minerals such as cobalt, lithium and rare earths. Copper is used in renewable energy systems and for wiring in electric vehicles (EVs) while nickel is a major component in many EV batteries. https://www.mining.com/web/eu-tags-...-wants-more/ and https://copperalliance.org/wp-conte...ials-Act.pdf
Edited by datadragon 04/28/2023 3:31 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19184 Posts |
Good discussion, datadragon.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
that 80/20 seems like a lot of fuss for such a small change in copper and nickel percentages
re changing the cent's core to steel, are there machines other than Coinstar and bank coin counters that still accept cents? heck, even those penny gumball machines disappeared decades ago
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1648 Posts |
Thanks @ijn1944, same for you  Quote: that 80/20 seems like a lot of fuss for such a small change in copper and nickel percentages
Seems that way, but they are reporting that based on 2022 volumes, the mint estimates the savings would add up - $12 million to $51 million annually potentially with minimal impact such as the vending machines. https://www.coinworld.com/news/us-c...-mint-choice It is part of a renewed effort to give the mint the authority to switch to using cheaper metal contents for making coins which could allow other changes based on the ongoing research. Its actually a big deal to coin enthusiasts since most of the USA coinage would change composition. Also there are possibilities for off metal errors and varieties. collectors may see a repeat of the 1982 scenario where there were several different seemingly alike Lincoln cents to be collected due to mid-year changes in metal composition as noted here https://www.numismaticnews.net/us-c...o-our-change
Edited by datadragon 04/29/2023 4:20 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188990 Posts |
Quote: I'd like to round any total over $1 to the nearest quarter, except rounding is mucked up by arcane state laws. For example, New Jersey requires sellers to round to the nearest cent when calculating sales tax... Federal law always supersedes state law. If the Federal government nixes everything below the quarter, then NJ has no choice but to round cash sales to the quarter (electronic sales can still go to the cent).
|
|
Valued Member
United States
216 Posts |
There are House and Senate bills, if passed, would allow the US Mint to change the composition of circulating coins.
I know that for years -- decades in fact -- the US Mint has sought affordable ways to change the composition of Lincoln pennies. The US Mint has explored steel and aluminum -- without success. Is there any metal/substance that the US Mint could use to keep the cost of minting pennies to less than 1 cent per piece? Other than steel or aluminum, I can think of only iron and plastic/polymers....
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34424 Posts |
@hid, as the topic of your recent thread was already being covered here, I've merged your thread with the older one.
I look forward to continued discussion!
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2365 Posts |
Digital currency is coming whether we like it or not. This could be a prelude to that happening en masse.
Edited by dsking 05/08/2023 11:04 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188990 Posts |
Quote: Is there any metal/substance that the US Mint could use to keep the cost of minting pennies to less than 1 cent per piece? No. Cost is already over one cent per cent even before adding the cost of the current copper plated zinc blanks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5191 Posts |
Redenomination is another option.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188990 Posts |
Quote: Redenomination is another option. Or just make the dime the "new cent" symbolically.  Get rid of the dollar notes and the dollar coins can be the new dime. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
235 Posts |
This is why I invest in gold and silver from Rosland Capital thanks to Bill Devane 
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 39 / Views: 3,444 |
Page 3 of 3
|