| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,649 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
201 Posts |
By the way, it's not a proof. It's a circulation strike.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
302 Posts |
Thanks for the info. When I first started going through rolls and boxes about 10 yrs ago I would just take out the wheaties and Indians. About 5 yrs ago when I found my first error coin a Cud it got me into collecting error coins. I never really cared for the condition of coins till last yr. Then I started saving them type of coins. I've searched more nickels than any other type of coins. I'm still learning as far as the rest of the stuff goes. Thats why I'm on here to gain knowledge from the experts. If I feel I know something then Ill give an input on something. Other than that I guess I'm still a little clueless as far as the whole coins go. |
|
Valued Member
United States
310 Posts |
looks like a nice 68-D circulation strike to me.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
201 Posts |
I pull all the nice RD's I find that are copper. Once I assemble a nice, full set, I'll start working on the zincs.
That one would definitely qualify as a keeper and go into a 2x2.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
Quote:
looks like a nice 68-D circulation strike to me.
Definitely S |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Man, am I glad to see this post because I have a number of 1960's era LMC coins that are as shiny as any 2008 MS coin, but the obverse device (usually only the obverse) appears very worn. Take a look at this pic. The 64D appears to have more wear than the 64P, but the coin shines like the sun on a summer day. I'm afraid the color doesn't come through very well in my scan. My questions is, if the wear is due to die polishing, Die Deterioration, or overuse, the coin may still be considered MS? Thanks for input.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
The LMC's were pretty ugly until 69..the obverse letters and numbers were thick and it was pretty common to see little or no seperation between the outside devices and rim.But yes scurry,they can still be MS when the dies are worn/polished.It would have been best to post a new topic but since you're new and Cud Wild's question was answered...we'll let you slide  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Thanks for the info Maineman. It was my intention to start a new thread, but when I saw this, I thought it was appropriate to just chime in. Wow, my first rule violation.  I'm putting this in my journal right away. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
594 Posts |
It seems as if whenever someone posts a pic and asks "Has this coin been cleaned?", the answer almost always automatically comes back cleaned. Even if it hasn't. HHmmm. Quote:
I would guess it was cleaned. The mint mark and obverse lettering looks worn from cleaning. It couldn't be worn because it has been in circulation for 43 years. |
|
Valued Member
United States
327 Posts |
Not cleaned, see lots of late 60's with the same "mushy" strikes, just a nice AU coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
Quote:
I was just trying to understand what to look for in a proof before 1975.
Mirror surface in the fields is the first thing to look for |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
proofs will also have sharp, squared rims
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1348 Posts |
JUST A NICE AU COIN NOT PROOF
|
|
Valued Member
United States
63 Posts |
I have some really nice 196x red cents too. I love flipping through the pages of my album and getting to those. I stop to admire them
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,649 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/01/2011 11:04 pm
