| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,705 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4132 Posts |
I finally got the replacement 2010 set (still waiting on the 2011) and it's still got problems.  It's not as bad as the other one, but there is quite a bit of spotting on two of the Presidential dollars, and there is what appears to be a cookie crumb inside the plastic with the Hot Springs quarter, and lots of other dust and debris in the plastic on all the sets. I might just live with it because I don't care that much about the Presidents... Well, one of the spotted ones is Abe, so that's a bummer, but the other is James Buchanan so he can bite it. I don't anticipate huge appreciation for proof sets, but maybe problem-free ones are going to be rare.  It's borderline for me to send it back considering the cost of shipping, and the odds that I'll get a better one seem remote. And if I send it back now, the 2011 will come in a couple days, and then I'll have to pay to send that one back in a separate shipment when it has a hole in one of the coins or something. What is the defect rate on these anyway? How hard is it to crack and re-close these cases to remove debris? I figure the brass dollars are gonna tone anyway, but if I can get the debris out of the cases the rest of the set will be OK.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I never open mine but give many away for Christmas prsents. Those people have told me the quality on theirs really stinks but since they are presents, I tell them to just keep for the future. Kind of tuff getting bad reports from someone you gave a present to. I stopped opening my own a long time ago.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1817 Posts |
It is too bad that there aren't more numismatic sales counters across the country. The salespeople there always let you choose among several sets the best ones the buy. Getting them in the mail and having to return them is a pain. The Mint should take a page from the RCM and sell coin products at the post office.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Quote:It is too bad that there aren't more numismatic sales counters across the country. The salespeople there always let you choose among several sets the best ones the buy. Getting them in the mail and having to return them is a pain. The Mint should take a page from the RCM and sell coin products at the post office. OR actually have some quality controls in place.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1064 Posts |
I'm really surprised to see some of these posts on poor quality U.S Mint coins; I've been buying proof and uncirculated packages, ASE's, commemoratives for many, many years, as presents for my youngest (and myself!), and have found them to be flawless, year after year. I had read that they were really scrutinized to catch any problems, and my experience seemed to support that. I recently stopped buying the yearly sets, as they had been Xmas presents for so long it was getting too predictable, and the prices seemed to be creeping up. Perhaps it's just the last few years that have suffered these issues, maybe too much volume or even revenue pressures?
|
|
New Member
United States
41 Posts |
I bought 3 proof eagles(silver)in 2010. one had nicks in the back of the coin a 2nd one has lint in it.Green lint.the nicked one I returned got back a very nice coin.i still have the one with lint in it.which I hope to post here some day
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Anyone who says die scratches will downgrade their coin doesn't know what they are talking about.
Proof sets have always been a sticking issue with me. Generally the packaging they are in reacts with the coins if they are not stored in a completely environmentally safe area. That's usually what happens to them by the time you get them - stuck for six months in a humid, hot warehouse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4132 Posts |
The 2011 set just arrived, and it's worse than the first one! A couple of the dollars have nasty brown spots, and the Gettysburg quarter has ugly white streaks on it of some kind. I'm not even being that picky, these are awful.
I'm returning them with a nasty letter. I may just get a refund and give up on collecting these entirely until I can get ones I can personally inspect before I buy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4132 Posts |
I wondering if I should just try to replace the problem coins off of ebay or something instead of sending back the sets, considering I'll just get two more that suck just as bad (particularly since sales of the 2010 sets is ending.) Maybe I would have better luck on sets ordered early in the year before they've been allowed to sit around in a sea-cave or wherever their warehouse is. With free shipping, I can probably get the handful I need almost as cheap as three more round trips to the mint with these sets.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
I would never order anything directly from the mint that I could easily get somewhere else...but that's just me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
584 Posts |
Captian I've had to send back many orders from the US MINT. The one that still drives me crazy is a 2010 PF SAE with two finger prints on the COIN! Their just partials but none the less finger prints. How the Helium do they get finger prints on them. I know someone wasn't doing their job! But stick to your guns! Don't settle for anything less then quality coins. Thats why your buying them! I've had to send back a few things more than once. I've never gone over three, and ever sense I started writing descriptive issues on the return paper (Use the back too) I've received a quality return the first round. The cases are not hard at all to open. Its just like opening a airtight, But you have corners to start out on. You might find yourself going round and round. When you get the first corner slightly opened use a finger nail or something to prop it open as you lift the other sides. Cause if you don't. As you lift one side the other goes back down. I've cursed the maker a few times. I can't stand looking through a foreign material to look at the coins. And also be careful where you set the open case down at, cause it will attract anything loose enough and fly right in, leaving you with a major mess. Must be a lint free microfiber cloth or something similar to wipe out lenses. Something like a paper towel will leave tons of fibers behind. Hope this helps! I thought they were all sealed like a slabbed coin, but their not! I think if you write a letter on your return form in a kind but direct way, asking them to please send you a replacement that will match the quality your use to seeing from them;0 Good Luck let us know how it goes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4132 Posts |
Yeah, I learned my lesson. I gotta find a local dealer so I can inspect proof sets before I buy them. I'm gonna send them back tomorrow, but this sorta thing just makes me exhausted.
Edited by CaptainFwiffo 08/24/2011 12:56 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4132 Posts |
Hmm, I just looked over the note I had written. I could be a little less nasty... The part about "if you can't provide a set of acceptable quality, just refund my credit card and I'll collect Canadian proof sets instead" was probably a bit much. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4132 Posts |
I got a "we're so sorry" form letter the other day apologizing for my bad experience. The 2011 set came back today, and it's more-or-less acceptable. One of the Presidential dollars is a little toned and spotty, but not anything like before, and the rest of the coins are OK, even if they're not straight 70s or anything. I don't think I'm gonna find myself in a situation 20 years from now thinking "damn, this proof set would be worth a fortune if it weren't for the spots on Rutherford B. Hayes! He's the key president!" We'll see if I even get a 2010 set back. I honestly hope they don't have any and I'll just get one I can inspect from a local coin shop, even if I have to pay a premium.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4132 Posts |
Finally, the 2010 set is OK! It only took them three tries and a couple months of trying, but it looks good!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,705 |
Page 2 of 2
|