| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 3,364 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1980 Posts |
please give your opinions on this coin thanks  
|
|
|
|
Forum Kid
Canada
1074 Posts |
AU-50 maybe higher? however, I have rarely see a coin in which has mint lustre but is worn.
Wait for an expert grader. very nice coin and well done pictures!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
A goodie
Obverse 1
XF 45.
doug
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
444 Posts |
I agree with Doug. Beat me to it.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
403 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1505 Posts |
XF max..
will post a AU 50 tomorrow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1505 Posts |
sorry guys, the coin is no longer mine. I sold it some time ago.
even though I have the pictures, it is too easy to identify and I can not post it.
sorry for being so hasty.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
I'd say VF30, maybe EF40.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21635 Posts |
EF40 Max. Nice clean coin though.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
414 Posts |
 No more than EF. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
627 Posts |
That big square jewel has way too much wear for AU. It even has too much wear for EF. The rest of the coin looks EF. It is either a weak strike or has suffered some serious cabinet rub. I like to see those big jewels sharper for EF condition.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Nice EF-40..  |
|
Valued Member
Canada
241 Posts |
VF30 due to wear on the large jewel.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1051 Posts |
On ICCS technicals, VF-30. PCGS grading, XF-40 or 45. The luster and overall appearance give you a higher initial grade impression than the actual wear present dictates.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
491 Posts |
VF-30 Grading because of the wear on the coin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1505 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,364 |
Posted 11/20/2014 10:44 pm
