Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1960 Jefferson Proof Or Business?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,568Next Topic
Page: of 2
New Member

United States
40 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  5:49 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add nicrob42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I bought this coin as a business strike but when it arrived the rim looks to be more proof like. I saw another post were someone was saying the same thing about the rim on there 1960 Jefferson, but all responses said it was a business strike even with the more squared rim.

I have posted pictures of the coin when it was posted for sale online along with a scanned set I took when it arrived.
Opinions?


1960-Jefferson-Proof-Or-Business?
1960-Jefferson-Proof-Or-Business?
1960-Jefferson-Proof-Or-Business?
1960-Jefferson-Proof-Or-Business?
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  6:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, I'm one who argued that other wasn't a proof until my last post which showed a side by side comparison and all I could do is head scratch. I'd have to see in hand, pix can't get it right I guess. The rims on yours are fair for a proof as are details, some business strikes of early 60's were quite nice if EDS. What stars out to me on yours are the steps, they are a full 6 step it Looks like and it has the wing steps at the end. Business strikes aren't generally THAT good. Now, what is the thickness of the rim ALL around, is it completely even? If so, that just may be a very impaired proof, doesn't seem to exhibit any high sheen proof luster.
New Member
United States
40 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  6:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nicrob42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I also have been scratching my head and looking online at others and I found the coin below online for sale and it was graded a MS66 by NGC and the rims are more like mine. I'm just not sure anymore it seems the more I try to figure it out the more I get confused.


1960-Jefferson-Proof-Or-Business?
1960-Jefferson-Proof-Or-Business?
1960-Jefferson-Proof-Or-Business?
CCF Advertiser
Andrew99's Avatar
United States
1533 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  6:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Andrew99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It looks like a proof. Business strikes don't generally develop that smooth haze over the surfaces.
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  6:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I will default to considering it a Proof. The steps are hammered, and Full Steps Business Strike 1960-P's are among the rarest of all Jeffersons in that state. PCGS shows over a thousand grading events for 1960-P, and 20 FS coins. Moreover, you can assume some of those are crackouts since the retail value quadruples between 64 and 65.

For the record, there are no 1960-P Jeffersons higher than MS66 at PCGS either.
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  6:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is an impaired proof but it looks like someone sneezed on it
Pillar of the Community
Mark1959's Avatar
7234 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  6:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mark1959 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nicely squared rims and the steps are killer.... Proof.
Bedrock of the Community
spru's Avatar
United States
12477 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  7:10 pm  Show Profile   Check spru's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add spru to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It looks like an impaired proof to me. The steps and rim are dead giveaways and the hazy fields are, as well. The haziness looks very similar to what's on a 1955 proof I bought (posted here somewhere) but, yours has progressed much further.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
Pillar of the Community
bd251's Avatar
United States
1843 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  7:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bd251 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Unless I'm missing something, that nickel is dated 1961 not 1960
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  7:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Unless I'm missing something, that nickel is dated 1961 not 1960


Must you complicate things with reality?

So, I'll modify my statement above: there are only 17 of these in FS at PCGS, not 20.

Pillar of the Community
bd251's Avatar
United States
1843 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  8:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bd251 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Must you complicate things with reality?


I sometimes find it necessary But everyone else was on board with 1960, so I thought maybe I was the one seeing things. Too bad about the haze, otherwise it would probably be easier to tell proof from a business strike. Having said that, what I have learned about Jefferson nickels from this site makes me say proof based on the reverse.
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  8:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Those steps sure say proof. You might try a pure acetone soak to get rid of the fly specs.

I think this is one that deserves a MS NGC submission if the specks disappear.
Rest in Peace
Buddy's Avatar
United States
7075 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  8:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Buddy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Rims....? All I see are those steps! Wowie!
Rest in Peace
T-BOP's Avatar
United States
18456 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  8:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add T-BOP to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have to go with an impaired proof. I wouldn't bother using Acetone , those spots will just laugh at it . No need to send it in . Full stepper ,it's a keeper .
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts
 Posted 09/25/2017  11:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TNG to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
nicrob42 1961 is a proof. Not the most expensive Jefferson proof so there is no big deal it has some issues. Easy enough to replace. There are quite a few different doubled dies for 1961 proofs so look closer, it might make for a better coin if you find some true doubling on it.
The flat rims are always a clue, but the flat field to the inner rim is the way to tell if it is proof.
The slabbed 1960 one is not, the obverse is obviously a business strike.
Look at the slabbed obverse particularly at the word IN and on the obverse at UNITED on the reverse where the field is curved up toward the rim.

I would point out that in the center of Jeffersons, the front door area and on the obverse the jaw and collar on his coat will sometimes show what looks to be scratches from contact or "bag marks".
I am convinced that these are often just leftover imperfections on the blank planchets.

1960-Jefferson-Proof-Or-Business?

Nickels are pretty hard coins and the pressure of the dies does not completely smooth out all these little imperfections on a fresh off the dies coin.
I think that might be why the MS66 nickel gets the grade despite what you see there on Jefferson's jaw and under the roof on the reverse over the pillars.
I think, the coin graders know this about coins, that they distinguish the difference between contact marks and planchet flaws.

So when you shop for a graded coin, or cherry pick from an uncirculated roll, you may find one with these marks where they are usually found, or you'll find nicks and bag marks and hits from the coins coming in contact with other coins in the bins and rolling machines. It might interest a fussy collector to look at these marks under high magnification and learn to tell the difference. They are not scratches. Which would you rather have? I'd rather have one that is without either and sharply struck myself.
New Member
United States
40 Posts
 Posted 09/26/2017  1:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nicrob42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry about putting the incorrect date on my post. I also want to thank everyone for the great info & opinions it really helps! I'm going to post some 1965, 1966 & 1967 sometime today that I need help with figuring out business from SMS they are really difficult for me to determine.
Edited by nicrob42
09/26/2017 1:59 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,568Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.35 seconds to rattle this change. Forums