| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,568 |
|
New Member
United States
40 Posts |
I bought this coin as a business strike but when it arrived the rim looks to be more proof like. I saw another post were someone was saying the same thing about the rim on there 1960 Jefferson, but all responses said it was a business strike even with the more squared rim. I have posted pictures of the coin when it was posted for sale online along with a scanned set I took when it arrived. Opinions  ?    
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Well, I'm one who argued that other wasn't a proof until my last post which showed a side by side comparison and all I could do is head scratch. I'd have to see in hand, pix can't get it right I guess. The rims on yours are fair for a proof as are details, some business strikes of early 60's were quite nice if EDS. What stars out to me on yours are the steps, they are a full 6 step it Looks like and it has the wing steps at the end. Business strikes aren't generally THAT good. Now, what is the thickness of the rim ALL around, is it completely even? If so, that just may be a very impaired proof, doesn't seem to exhibit any high sheen proof luster.
|
|
New Member
 United States
40 Posts |
|
|
CCF Advertiser
United States
1533 Posts |
It looks like a proof. Business strikes don't generally develop that smooth haze over the surfaces.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I will default to considering it a Proof. The steps are hammered, and Full Steps Business Strike 1960-P's are among the rarest of all Jeffersons in that state. PCGS shows over a thousand grading events for 1960-P, and 20 FS coins. Moreover, you can assume some of those are crackouts since the retail value quadruples between 64 and 65.
For the record, there are no 1960-P Jeffersons higher than MS66 at PCGS either.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
It is an impaired proof but it looks like someone sneezed on it 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Nicely squared rims and the steps are killer.... Proof.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12477 Posts |
 It looks like an impaired proof to me. The steps and rim are dead giveaways and the hazy fields are, as well. The haziness looks very similar to what's on a 1955 proof I bought (posted here somewhere) but, yours has progressed much further.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020 In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020 In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1843 Posts |
Unless I'm missing something, that nickel is dated 1961 not 1960 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: Unless I'm missing something, that nickel is dated 1961 not 1960
Must you complicate things with reality?  So, I'll modify my statement above: there are only 17 of these in FS at PCGS, not 20. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1843 Posts |
Quote: Must you complicate things with reality? I sometimes find it necessary  But everyone else was on board with 1960, so I thought maybe I was the one seeing things.  Too bad about the haze, otherwise it would probably be easier to tell proof from a business strike. Having said that, what I have learned about Jefferson nickels from this site makes me say proof based on the reverse.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Those steps sure say proof. You might try a pure acetone soak to get rid of the fly specs.
I think this is one that deserves a MS NGC submission if the specks disappear.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7075 Posts |
Rims....? All I see are those steps! Wowie! 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I have to go with an impaired proof. I wouldn't bother using Acetone , those spots will just laugh at it . No need to send it in . Full stepper ,it's a keeper . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
nicrob42 1961 is a proof. Not the most expensive Jefferson proof so there is no big deal it has some issues. Easy enough to replace. There are quite a few different doubled dies for 1961 proofs so look closer, it might make for a better coin if you find some true doubling on it. The flat rims are always a clue, but the flat field to the inner rim is the way to tell if it is proof. The slabbed 1960 one is not, the obverse is obviously a business strike. Look at the slabbed obverse particularly at the word IN and on the obverse at UNITED on the reverse where the field is curved up toward the rim. I would point out that in the center of Jeffersons, the front door area and on the obverse the jaw and collar on his coat will sometimes show what looks to be scratches from contact or "bag marks". I am convinced that these are often just leftover imperfections on the blank planchets.  Nickels are pretty hard coins and the pressure of the dies does not completely smooth out all these little imperfections on a fresh off the dies coin. I think that might be why the MS66 nickel gets the grade despite what you see there on Jefferson's jaw and under the roof on the reverse over the pillars. I think, the coin graders know this about coins, that they distinguish the difference between contact marks and planchet flaws. So when you shop for a graded coin, or cherry pick from an uncirculated roll, you may find one with these marks where they are usually found, or you'll find nicks and bag marks and hits from the coins coming in contact with other coins in the bins and rolling machines. It might interest a fussy collector to look at these marks under high magnification and learn to tell the difference. They are not scratches. Which would you rather have? I'd rather have one that is without either and sharply struck myself.
|
|
New Member
 United States
40 Posts |
Sorry about putting the incorrect date on my post. I also want to thank everyone for the great info & opinions it really helps! I'm going to post some 1965, 1966 & 1967 sometime today that I need help with figuring out business from SMS they are really difficult for me to determine. 
Edited by nicrob42 09/26/2017 1:59 pm
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,568 |