| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 2,842 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1370 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7841 Posts |
I was going to give her an AU50 before I saw the slab label...JA liked it...I don't care for the splotchy toning though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2843 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
I agree with 55. Left top wing feather on reverse is the epitome of this technical grade. I like toning if it enhances the design. I don't particularly care for this toning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Proper grade - but not thrilled with the toning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1370 Posts |
probably not worth 4 bills huh
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7841 Posts |
Quote:
probably not worth 4 bills huh I would squirrel away ($$$) for another day. Edited by oih82w8
09/26/2017 4:01 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree with grade but not a fan.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Quote:
I was going to give her an AU50 before I saw the slab label... Yeah me too . And I have to agree with most on the splotchy toning .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10065 Posts |
When I see tarnish (oops - toning) like this it just makes the coin look dirty to me.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
I looked at auction results via the NGC price guide. I agree with AU55. A pretty nice AU55 sold for around $250. Really nice coins with virtually no toning sold for over $400. The toning is keeping the price down on this "CAC" coin. If you like the coin, I'd suggest offering a price more in line with the toning ($300) or less.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1370 Posts |
Decided to pass. I've found myself thinking about re-sell every time I consider purchasing a coin. Testing the waters here shows me that this would be a hard coin to move if I chose to.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,842 |
|
Posted 09/26/2017 3:16 pm
