I see that I might be slightly misusing the term "cameo" according to some posts... I really meant that I like these worn down to such a state that surface details of the devices are just ghostly outlines without detail. I wasn't referring to the level of contrast between the devices and the field. I know in proofs that there is a premium attached to high contrast at certain lighting angles which makes the devices really stand out.
I wish I COULD post pictures!
A lot of the ones I see in here would grade higher than what I am referring to. Some are harder to find than others in really low grades... I haven't found "my" Columbian yet but I am looking. That Iowa has fair detail left. Not really a fan of field toning like that one has. I don't understand how some get darker in the fields than others, I have thought of it as coming from a "dirtier" environment, like a pocket piece owned by a railroad guy or an industrial worker... but that may not be the case.
Just getting started good in this area!
I wish I COULD post pictures!
A lot of the ones I see in here would grade higher than what I am referring to. Some are harder to find than others in really low grades... I haven't found "my" Columbian yet but I am looking. That Iowa has fair detail left. Not really a fan of field toning like that one has. I don't understand how some get darker in the fields than others, I have thought of it as coming from a "dirtier" environment, like a pocket piece owned by a railroad guy or an industrial worker... but that may not be the case.
Just getting started good in this area!
Edited by secondnomore
11/05/2018 9:51 pm
11/05/2018 9:51 pm




























































