| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,916 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
612 Posts |
Not my coin but I am curious what the consensus might be.   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36770 Posts |
I'm at MS-62 on this one. Face is pretty rough looking.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
Agree with MS-62. Great luster, but quite a bit of scuffing over the roller marks on the cheek. Might look better in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Wow that cheek is ugly. I say MS-63 lacking eye appeal.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1515 Posts |
Looks like she got in a fight. MS-63
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18670 Posts |
KauaiHawaiiGuy...you are a bad boy trying to fool CCF members. this coins was taken from the PCGS grading scale. its the MS63 example...so I'm going to say MS63  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
612 Posts |
Panzaldi said ...... Quote:
KauaiHawaiiGuy...you are a bad boy trying to fool CCF members. this coins was taken from the PCGS grading scale. its the MS63 example...so I'm going to say MS63 And he's right as to where the coin came from, but not that I was trying to fool anybody, only that the other day I asked a question at the main coin forum about "Rub vs Wear", the post is still there near the top if anyone cares to look, and to me that cheek in the PCGS example looks like what I would think of as rub from a roll of Morgans or cabinet rub, and wanted to see how the other members saw it. Well I am surprised that you were all about right, and even though some of you mentioned the cheek, none of you downgraded it to AU status. I have even more respect for the forum members after this little stunt I pulled than before. Thanks for your input |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36770 Posts |
It's definitely not an AU coin. The only rubbing is from coin to coin in bags.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
612 Posts |
But IndianGoldEagle, when you said ........ Quote:
It's definitely not an AU coin. The only rubbing is from coin to coin in bags. That is exactly the point I raised at that post I mentioned at the main coin forum. If rub is not considered wear, and the rub as in this coin is exactly at the same high points on a Morgan that wear occurs at, e.g. hair above ear, high point of cheek, above and below eye etc., then what's the difference? Is it only a judgement call like an ice skating judge where one sees the performance as a 9.5 and another a 9.7? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
I interpret rub and wear as the same thing.
This coin has neither.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5672 Posts |
Typically in a lightly circulated coin you would see overall loss of luster and some circulation marks in the fields, in addition to the slight wear or rub on the high points. But there is no hard line between MS and AU since it really is a continuum, so in the end it has to be a judgement call on where to draw the line.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36770 Posts |
I should have said instead of coin to coin "rub", coin to coin contact. This one looks like it was horizontal coin to coin slide causing the friction marks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
It looks like the planchet had roller marks showing up on the cheek. I was at MS63 with a shot at MS64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1086 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,916 |
Posted 07/06/2022 11:50 am
