| Author |
Replies: 64 / Views: 6,049 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
In some ways the PCGS thing and the new collectors coming into the market could be related. It is possible that a number of collectors are seeing that the big die varieties are gaining a LOT of value, and want in on finding something to submit and profit from. My perspective, however, keeps them separated to a certain extent because I know there are a LOT of people just sorting through change trying to find ANYTHING scarce and of-interest...like about 90% of the people who found and post on this forum.
VERY few people could care less about the value of said coins. I don't know a collector who is ONLY collecting to find the stuff that holds value to other people yet doesn't care at all how much they could get for the same pieces. Everybody to some extent cares about value - which is why most of my answers and responses here touch on value. It keeps the inevitable from happening - what is this? It's this. Okay, how much is it worth? Easier to just do it in one post.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
^Brilliant! Nicely said Chuck! I've only been looking for varieties for a couple of years and you echo my sentiments exactly. "Greed" is human nature. No matter what they say everyone wants something that others don't or can't have.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
601 Posts |
There's nothing that I can disagree with or pick any points about in what you say Chuck. Agreed that PCGS pushes the prices, they are market makers, it's simply their business. One can only hope that they continue to recognize the expansion of our hobby, which will propel more growth. PCGS would do well to start attributing TOP 100 RPMs, and I expect we'll see that day. Word to the wise, when it occurs, you won't be getting them for the less than $10 you can now. But it wasn't my intention to fixate only on the slab aspect of die varieties. The demand for doubled dies and other well accepted varieties has given rise to exciting new areas such as Trail Dies and Wavy Steps....just a few short years ago, these types weren't even recognized by authorities in the field. They may seem small and inconsequential at the moment, but 20 years ago, that was the prevailing sentiment with 99.9% of the collecting community in regard to much of what is now highly coveted in our world. Chuck's reference to the '71 DDO #1 is the perfect example- that coin now regularly sells for $2500-3000 in MS-65. Not estimates, ACTUAL prices paid! Edited for clarification
Edited by liveandievarieties 04/05/2011 1:42 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Additionally, even though there would be less impact than we see with PCGS, if NGC, ANACS, and other sources were to have verifiable collection 'competitions', it could lead us into a world where any and all recognized die varieties from any one of those sources could be more valuable because of demand.
Let's face it - everybody likes to see their names in the marquee lights as having the best of something. It's just that some people are willing to go to more financial lengths than others to see it. The extent of the individual wallets can be realized in friendly competition where money talks.
To that end, one of the features planned for coppercoins v.3.0 will be just that - a verified collector's inventory based on a point system for having any of the different known varieties that others can see and try to 'beat'. I am in the throws of working on the data structure for just such a feature as we speak...and it wasn't this thread that made me realize it was needed. I've been involved in thinking about this and planning for this for over five years now.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
And to provide a little clarification on paragraph #2 above - I would not be the only person to benefit from seeing more collector competitions. Everybody in the hobby would benefit from it except those who start from nothing, don't want to go throught he work of searching, and just want to be "on top" - they would have to buy every point they had. Those of us who have spent years searching through thousands and thousands of coins would have a large number of free points at the get-go because we already have a number of the coins the new wallets would have to buy.
It works that way for all competitions of this nature. If I were to suddenly start collecting football cards and wanted to be the #1 person in the registry for a 1956 Topps football set, I'd have to open the wallet and start buying cards...but for the 30 year veteran who swapped and traded to get most of their 1956 cards, they would be above the curve as soon as the registry started.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Quote: There's nothing that I can disagree with or pick any points about in what you say Chuck. Hmmph.. I can. You can't throw everyone's motives in a pot called 'greed' and call it done  Lots of people do it for the challenge, the history, the learning experience, or just for the coolness factor. I would say the majority do start in that camp, but not everyone stays there. Quote: Let's face it - everybody likes to see their names in the marquee lights as having the best of something. Hmm.. not everyone. I can think of a few whose name would be "An Anonymous Buyer"  Not getting on you.. just pointing out that although you guys may think you're only speaking to Mr. Greedy, he's not the only type of person who is listening.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
I'm only going on the psychology of human nature here. I don't know of a collector who ONLY collects because they want to put a set of something together with NO regard to value, rarity, or the future disposition of said collection.
It's not as single threaded as I might have made it appear, and for that I stand corrected - but to some extent or another, everyone's motives in collecting do have something to do with greed. Whether it be 1% or 100% of their reason, it's always included. Whether it's that you collect toys so nobody else can have any or that you collect toys to relive a childhood or share the history of the toys, it's still collecting - and that mentality does incorporate greed.
It's our society that tends to look upon greed as a bad thing because in excess it takes from others and is religiously frowned upon. The one thing we cannot escape, however, is that we are human and do operate on greed to some extent - ALL of us.
And you are correct - there are some collectors who don't want the attention to their name - so they use an alias instead. Either way, almost anyone - ANYONE - who is going to take part in a registry (which was the subject) is doing it to see their accomplishment listed at the top of some list, and many are willing to spend whatever it takes to get there. So I should have said, "everybody likes to see credit for their accomplishments in some fasion." I know of no person who has EVER spent moon money on a coin just to quietly squirrel it away so nobody knows about it. Perhaps I'm naive or vain or something.
One other point not made before this post is that some people actually collect errors and die varieties because they are irrefutable evidence that the Government indeed does make mistakes and that they are not perfect. That the regulations that hold them to the highest set of standards are sometimes sidetracked, and the evidence of this is the result - less than perfect, messed up coins. Perhaps the greed evidenced here is the need to prove a point that need not be proven - having to be right is a form of greed, if you bend it just right and look at it sideways.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
The completely "non-greedy" coin hunter would find a nice die variety, look at it, and toss it back in the roll so someone else could find it. Ever hear of someone who looks through coins for hours on end and has not one coin in a collection to speak for it?
I didn't think so.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Quote: The completely "non-greedy" coin hunter would find a nice die variety, look at it... ...and tell the dealer what they have. Not to dismiss "greed*", or brag--but I've told dealers what they have, and not always to my advantage. *I might consider myself greedy when I pick out unattributed DVs, but it's so time consuming that I doubt it's a living wage; it's just fun! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Quote: having to be right is a form of greed, if you bend it just right and look at it sideways. Nice one  And gathering knowledge could be a type of it, as well... although it's one of the few things that if you get more it doesn't mean there is less out there for everyone else. Quote: The completely "non-greedy" coin hunter would find a nice die variety, look at it, and toss it back in the roll so someone else could find it. Ever hear of someone who looks through coins for hours on end and has not one coin in a collection to speak for it? No - not ones without coins entirely. And I've never heard of anyone tossing them back - but they *do* give/send them to coin-collecting friends. If you just toss it back, you run the risk of the poor thing being ruined  The registry does sound interesting - a lot of people would probably really enjoy the competition (and their name on top of the list, too).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Ahh, the "preservationist" angle. That's what I am, if you boil it down to the bone. I really don't "collect" because it doesn't matter to me if I have everything. I just want to keep the doubled dies from the gutters, parking lots, etc. I want to preserve all there is out there.
I am also greedy, though. I do charge for the coins I procure, and charge for the time it takes to teach and write about them (except here). Of course with that greed comes the ability to set food on the table and have a roof to sleep under.
If I had some job that paid well enough so that I had time to search for coins and find the good ones and it didn't make up the lion's share of my income - who knows what I would do? Different frame of reference.
I do believe the prices ont he coins I offer are definitely reasonable, as most of the time I price them below the current market trends...but I guess most retailers think they are giving their customers a bargain.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
I have to agree with xshift on that last one....I've got double and triples of varieties that I could easily sell, but just don't have the urge to do so. I've given away enough of them, but never sold a variety or error that I can recall. And I keep my "finds" seperate from what I buy and resell. As for greed, I see nothing wrong with it at all.But I do have a problem when lying,cheating, and stealing accompany it.
|
|
Valued Member
273 Posts |
What is driving this for me is that I finally have time ("retired") not to forget greed and pride... get ready for the baby boomer boom. I just went through several thousand cents and realized that I failed to "look" for "everything". If I knew how to organize, it might enhance the learning curve. If anyone cares to comment on how one might prepare and organize a search, would much appreciate. I have found this forum very valuable and sites like coppercoins.com... also purchasing low end examples (from the former but also available from other forum members) has been a tremendous help.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts |
Quote: And to provide a little clarification on paragraph #2 above - I would not be the only person to benefit from seeing more collector competitions. Everybody in the hobby would benefit from it except those who start from nothing, don't want to go throught he work of searching, and just want to be "on top" - they would have to buy every point they had. Those of us who have spent years searching through thousands and thousands of coins would have a large number of free points at the get-go because we already have a number of the coins the new wallets would have to buy.
It works that way for all competitions of this nature. If I were to suddenly start collecting football cards and wanted to be the #1 person in the registry for a 1956 Topps football set, I'd have to open the wallet and start buying cards...but for the 30 year veteran who swapped and traded to get most of their 1956 cards, they would be above the curve as soon as the registry started. Sounds like the same type of sales-driven marketing gimmick the TPGs pioneered with their registry sets in order to exploit the vulnerability of egocentric collectors for adolescent bragging rights. Yeah, it might work. I think I'd sit that one out, though. No offense intended.
|
|
Valued Member
273 Posts |
I don't always make myself clear. The reason purchasing examples has helped is that looking at the coin you are holding in you fingers with a lens... KNOWING that it is variety XYZ... just seems to "click" the identification process better than just pictures/description alone. AND how the above and my previous two posts relate to the topic: Values relate directly to the available collector base. And the related question was what is bringing (or will bring)that collector base. Competition? Yes. Greed? Yes. But ultimately... accessibility. And one 'typical collector group' is represented here by me. Can a 65 year old such myself (and by the way my wife frequently claims I am also adolescent) figure this thing out? I will keep you posted. Nothing wrong with promotion and profit. Every SUCCESSFUL sport/hobby/profession has promoters. Varieties being under recognized and SO MANY NEW VARIETIES... makes it seem a little less like a zero sum game... and my greed says that is OK.
Edited by Changeless 04/05/2011 4:23 pm
|
| |
Replies: 64 / Views: 6,049 |