I'm guessing with 50 page views and no guesses the photos must be bad. I think I'll remove this one in a little bit and try them again in a few weeks when the slabs arrive. Thanks for looking.
Grading XF-AU-Low MS coins is all about luster, and your imaging style shows zero luster. I'd head over to the photography forum, post your setup, and get some feedback on how to better showcase the luster of the coins you're showing us.
For those that saw the images and wondered, none of these were MS so luster was not much of an issue. I will be interested to watch other posts to see if people grade other coins that don't have pro photos. So far I have seen one already.
Luster is still hugely important especially with something like WLH's, a series which can be marred by weak strikes. How is one to differentiate between a weak strike and wear without seeing the luster of the coin? Especially on coins that may have both wear and a weak strike, luster takes on even more importance. Just food for thought... Luster (or the absence of it) retains importance in the XF40-AU58 grading band... correct, not as much as the MS grades, but still a major part of grade determination.
The photos I posted were actually very representative of the actual coin. Maybe that should have been the question you asked before you attacked my style. Unlike most ebay sellers I do not add luster to my photos to try and get another dollar out of them.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use