Help With Defining Proof Die Strike?

You can post pics.
John1

Here is the listing http://www.ebay.com/itm/Morgan-Silv...047675.l2557

I received the coin today, and here are a few points of note:

1. it is probably not but AU53 at the very most, perhaps high EF
2. It has a rim that is "raised and squared" around the perimeter, and looks nothing like a standard business strike Morgan.
3.Compared to MS and VF morgans, it looks like neither, as the surface is "glossier", there really is no word to define it.
4. I have no idea what the 2 ink blotches are on it, as it almost looks like "black polish" that is permanently adhesed to the coin.
5. The letters do not have the somewhat "bubbly" appearance of my regular Morgans; they instead seem to be actually more squared, seems like the lettering on reverse and obverse are "flatter and squarer"
6. The surface looks like silky smooth graphite
7. Weighs 26.6 grams, and passes magnet test (I am paranoid)
8. Although weak, the VF 1899-O morgan and 1904-O Morgans I compare with this one look totally different, as this coin almost has a "Cameo-Like" appearance no matter how light dark, high or low angle...Not much, but WAY different than the other VF-EF coins I am using for comparison.
9. Despite some clear cleaning efforts, the smoothness of the fields, cheek, etc...are the smoothest and most liquid I have seen.
10. I see no traditional bag marks.

...Anyway, I will have pics up later, but I am lost. I assume it is not a proof, but I cannot say why it looks so different.

If this is close to any of the theories out there, this "whizzing" I just read about would be the closest decription to what I am seeing. It certainly is more "chrome" looking, but more of a milky mirror is the way I describe it, as there is no coin on the planet that should demonstrate DMPL qualities in this condition, with this toning/carbon buildup.

Thanks again,
EndTheFed