| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,034 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
421 Posts |
Wanted to see what y'all think this coin got graded. Thanks   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11924 Posts |
 ms65bn |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
841 Posts |
Very nice LC. I would think at least
ms64.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say MS-62BN, possibly 63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
I'm in the MS-64 BN group.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
Nice sharp details on the reverse - I'll go with MS64BN
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3168 Posts |
ms64 brown is my guess
Edited by jerryc39
12/26/2020 7:57 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
The spots on the obverse might hold it to 64 but technically I think it's MS-65 BN. Lovely example.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
421 Posts |
Here is the grade.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Missed this one. I had this one at a low 64 BN
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Spotting dooms this one to 63 for eternity, name your TPG. Edited by Coinfrog
12/26/2020 8:34 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11924 Posts |
Nice pickup. Coin looks undergraded.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The underlying luster has given the patina a nice satin effect. Does the spotting affect the grade as well as the eye appeal? I am looking for the comments of others concerning this coin. I seems to me, that the opinion of the TPG was influenced downwards by the spotting If so, I agree. |
|
Valued Member
United States
421 Posts |
It was graded by icg if it was undergraded I probably still would not get it regraded never know they might grade it questionable color on a bad day or something never know. Lol
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,034 |
|
Posted 12/26/2020 5:07 pm
