| Author |
Replies: 36 / Views: 4,555 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
997 Posts |
My thoughts would be to just actually revalue the dollar by a factor of 10. This would bring us back in line with the prices of the WW2 era. A new dollar (coin or paper) would be worth $10 of the current currency.
We would then reconfigure the currency do that the coins are instantly identifiable as the new or old coins. Use 11 sided coins in different sizes, with copper colored 1, 5 and 10 cent coins and silver colored 25, 50 and 100 cent coins. They could even use Twooney style bi-metallic coins for $2, $5 and $10 coins and eliminate paper bills below $20.
It will never happen but ya never know....
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
The main problem with any possiby changes to our monitary system is the government just doesn't care what you, me or anyone says. They will either keep the Cent, make it smaller, make it bigger, maie it out of Gold, they just don't care. Do we need any coins at all? Why not stop all coins now or soon. Make it all a plastic country. How about making a new 2 Cent, 3 Cent, 20 Cent coins again. Why not? If they decide to do that, they will regardless of who says what. I would like to see all our coins made in every variety of denominations from a 1 Cent to a 99 Cent coin. Picture that being spent at a McDonalds.  And with so much complaints about coins, why not change everything to papper. Picture a 1 Cent Bill.  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Carl could you imagine the dansco type set albums for that lol
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3692 Posts |
This idea makes way too much sense, hence it makes no sense to politicians. What you really need is to bring back the $2 bill and retract every $1 bill by force.
Anyone who's used Canadian Tire money knows how long it takes to tally those up for a purchase. It's a pain in the kiester, mister. A one cent bill would just be comical.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
I really like the idea of bringing our coinage up to the next decimal point.
Reduce the size of the half and make it golden like the dollar (smaller than the dollar, larger than the dime), kill pennies, nickels and quarters.
Enjoy the simplicity. :-)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
74 Posts |
I've also thought about this before.. a dime, two-dime, half-dollar, and dollar coin. With the two-dime coin, no transaction would need more than three coins.
Rounding would not cost us money because rounding goes both ways. Also the marketing ploy will still be usable. Instead of $24.99, you'll see $24.9. I suppose electronic transactions could still go to the cent, but it's not necessary because over many transactions that value will be VERY similar to the dime-based value.
The issue isn't Congress as much as it is the people. As logical as the system is, politicians know that society has been unwilling to adopt changes in currency (the Sacagewea dollar coin for example). An entire overhaul would be confusing for the public and, perhaps, disastrous to the marketplace.
Edited by vince220 08/19/2012 12:23 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
I like the idea but it's pretty expensive.
The cheapest way to fix the mess is to switch the nickel to aluminum and remove its legal tender status and to eliminate the cent and dollar bill. This actually saves money and the recalled coins can be melted for profit.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1227 Posts |
I dislike the idea because it's too much, all at once. Nobody will take well to a completely revamped system thrown on them all at one time (look at how decimalization went for Britain--as late as the 90s I could STILL flip on British TV or read a British newsmagazine and hear them complaining about it), especially with the world going through a recession right now.
As for revaluing the dollar, n9, I encourage you to read "The Running Man" by Stephen King (under the pseudonym Richard Bachman). In that book, the exact thing you've proposed has happened, and New Currency is all made out of plastic. Some places will not even accept Old Currency (e.g., at one point the main character needs to use a pay phone--keep in mind this story was written in the 1970s--and is told he'll have to trade a dollar's worth of Old Quarters to get the two New Quarters he needs).
The problem? New Currency was made available to the wealthy first, and they promptly used it to segregate the country into poor slaves and wealthy upper crust. That's not an exaggeration, either--people from the main character's side of the Hudson River are actually not allowed to have New Currency. It's a crime, as is working a whole slew of better-paying jobs. How long did it take to put this in place? Only about seventy years from end to end, which, if you think about it, is absolutely frightening (this book also predicted the rise of reality television thirty years before it happened and also postulated the idea that we might be poisoning our air far more than we knew long before King had anything to back that idea up, so don't just brush it off as pure fiction, either--he was onto something).
With the political climate standing as it is, I hesitate to suggest a revaluing of anything, because it's our vulnerable--poor folks paid in cash--who would suffer. I don't think it's a good idea unless all the old money is immediately withdrawn from circulation and everyone is given a fair shot at the new currency.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Except we dont live in the totalitarian government that was present in the running man. Well go to civil war before that happens in America.
The problem with revaluing the currency to have it worth more isn't the Running Man, its trade. Yes it would be easier for us if our money was worth more like in the old days, but it would kill our exports. Everything would become more expensive for other nations to buy and their would be cheaper alternatives for them to shop. Basically wed just be a buyer and no longer an exporter which would destroy a lot of manufacturing jobs and probably put the entire middle of the country on welfare.
Its a nice idea to be able to buy things again with change but its just not a practical solution and wont happen without a period of hyperinflation first which would eventually need to be corrected unless we like the idea of trillion dollar bills.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Quote: Yes it would be easier for us if our money was worth more like in the old days, but it would kill our exports. Everything would become more expensive for other nations to buy and their would be cheaper alternatives for them to shop. This is the one best reason to go all plastic. Eventually on Earth this will HAVE to happen. The reason is even now becomimg apparent. How much is a 42" Sony TV in Russia? How much for the same one in India? Brazil, New York? International trading just has to go all digital and done with plastic. No more monitary systems anywhere. You go to a store anywhere on Earth and the computers say how much you pay via your plastic card. You no longer have to woneder how much an Apple costs in the Belgium Congo, Argentina, Iran, etc. since it's all done by computers via a plastic card. The only real problem with the above is how would our politidcians get their kick backs.  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
I agree eventually we will be on some sort of all plastic system when that day is who knows. But at least in our lifetime I dont think that would really solve the price differences between here and other countries. Even if the companies got them at the same price there would still need to be markups from those areas from the cost of employees and keeping stores open here ect which are one of the bigger reasons our prices are higher. Certainly in some areas of the country prices are higher because they can be but also land is more expensive in those areas making prices higher.
Its kind of one of those tradeoffs. Raising minimum wage would give some people more money but they may end up having a higher cost of living as it drives the costs of goods up. Assuming nothing drastic happens the most practical solution seems to be just adjusting what the currency is as no one wants to see people making 10 cents a day like in China where we just will never be able to compete with their cheap labor in that sense
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Quote: What you really need is to bring back the $2 bill and retract every $1 bill by force.
I'm not a currency collector so not sure but on many occations lately I've asked for and received what looks like new $2 bills at banks. And I get those same lousy looks when spending them as with the baby sized dollar coins.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
It is odd how 2 dollar bills dont seem to circulate yet they are always available at banks
|
|
Valued Member
United States
310 Posts |
Really...Removing the 1 dollar bill, and forcing the $1 coin and using the 2 dollar bill would save plenty of money. probably wouldn't have to eliminate the penny or nickel to brake even then.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
89 Posts |
As long as we're proposing huge monetary changes, I suggest we bring back the $500 and $1000.
|
| |
Replies: 36 / Views: 4,555 |