I still need to here from SSDAVE, Before I talk about this VAM, I seem to need to swit=ch over to outlook, as I use hotmail, so if he has mailed me I havent seen it yet,,
HOW EVER,,
you folks are stumbling at the most basic levels....
Vamming is NOT a GUESSING GAME....
it does follow rigid basic rules to follow to discern
any VAM's potential assignment..So as our guesses online here have moved quite away from the basic chain...
Lets get back to the basics.....
the first thing is ...ONLY an individual that has studied "any" certain year can look beyond the basics...
such things as die cracks....AARE finger prints, but seldom used as most coins don't list ALLLLLLLLLL
of the attributes of any coin listed as a VAM....
IN FACT if you haven't noticed many are just a description and no, of few photo's...
SO LETS GET BACK TO BASICS, with this coin...
I have to note... the originator,
has the "BEST PHOTO'S"...quality....80% have poor quality in which we have to strain and nearly pull teeth to get them to figure out what WE are trying to see in order to help them....
Now for the coin here....
I have to ask.....as all have seemed to look beyond the basics...to GUESS at the rest.....
THIS IS NOT HOW ITS DONE...
FOREMOST IS:....#1....Date placement...
#2....Mint Mark Placement
"NOTE" this is only the first 2, important steps.....
Yet these are the most lost efforts,
Used principles...PEOPLE the listings are based on the listing principles...
"so if your date placement is NORMAL" WHY whould we look at listings that have a different date placement....? THIS is also true for the
MINT MARK placement......
THESE ARE 2 unfalible FACTS from these two points the VAM designations are determined.....
#1...this a normal date placement..not near or far date.
#2...This a normal Mint Mark placement...NOT high or low left or right.....WHICH the guesses have included which are out side of the actual VAM's designation..for example
The VAM 10 or 10A...Date placement is correct, as its normal, but the supporting die cracks are all wrong...for this coin/////
There is one major point on this coin, that has been over looked...the originator of this post does not receive email, so I will still wait to see if someone else, notices this or "hear" my cry LOL....LOL...
HOW EVER,,
you folks are stumbling at the most basic levels....
Vamming is NOT a GUESSING GAME....
it does follow rigid basic rules to follow to discern
any VAM's potential assignment..So as our guesses online here have moved quite away from the basic chain...
Lets get back to the basics.....
the first thing is ...ONLY an individual that has studied "any" certain year can look beyond the basics...
such things as die cracks....AARE finger prints, but seldom used as most coins don't list ALLLLLLLLLL
of the attributes of any coin listed as a VAM....
IN FACT if you haven't noticed many are just a description and no, of few photo's...
SO LETS GET BACK TO BASICS, with this coin...
I have to note... the originator,
has the "BEST PHOTO'S"...quality....80% have poor quality in which we have to strain and nearly pull teeth to get them to figure out what WE are trying to see in order to help them....
Now for the coin here....
I have to ask.....as all have seemed to look beyond the basics...to GUESS at the rest.....
THIS IS NOT HOW ITS DONE...
FOREMOST IS:....#1....Date placement...
#2....Mint Mark Placement
"NOTE" this is only the first 2, important steps.....
Yet these are the most lost efforts,
Used principles...PEOPLE the listings are based on the listing principles...
"so if your date placement is NORMAL" WHY whould we look at listings that have a different date placement....? THIS is also true for the
MINT MARK placement......
THESE ARE 2 unfalible FACTS from these two points the VAM designations are determined.....
#1...this a normal date placement..not near or far date.
#2...This a normal Mint Mark placement...NOT high or low left or right.....WHICH the guesses have included which are out side of the actual VAM's designation..for example
The VAM 10 or 10A...Date placement is correct, as its normal, but the supporting die cracks are all wrong...for this coin/////
There is one major point on this coin, that has been over looked...the originator of this post does not receive email, so I will still wait to see if someone else, notices this or "hear" my cry LOL....LOL...
























