| Author |
Replies: 162 / Views: 12,396 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
The Euro itself has failed to a certain extent because they let countries into it the probably should have never been let in. I understand the idea behind it, but personally I am not a fan of these global currencies. It allows countries like Cyrus or Greece to have a domino effect on the rest of the countries where if they had their own currency their isolated failures would mean little if anything to the rest of Europe.
To me its one of those ideas that sounds good on paper but is terrible in practice. It punishes the countries that are responsible as they just end up bailing out the ones that arent and that safety net to an extent rewards supporting things you know the country cant afford but you can enjoy anyway with the help of the rest of the EU.
That said no one in Europe would think twice about accepting a Euro as payment so it hasnt failed in that regard. There always is the option of just abandoning it and starting fresh with your own currencies and I wouldnt be shocked if at some point some of the stronger ones pull out either going their own way or forming their own thats harder to get into. I dont think Europe will become the next India though where people just hoard PMs and banks are few and far between
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
And one really wouldn't expect there to be as the immediate problem which is the problem most people will focus on, is the shortage of cash. This presents a problem even for those who have hard assets for sale. Hence the temporary weakness in gold.
Edited by wjl 04/06/2013 5:49 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
"The Euro itself has failed to a certain extent because they let countries into it the probably should have never been let in."
The same thing could have been said about the US two and a half centuries ago, but at least back then our leaders recognized the problem and retired the debt of the States. This did not happen in Euroland as this idea would not tend to be popular with bankers. Too bad or them. It was probably a bad idea, but it just wasn't done right and thats really the problem.
Edited by wjl 04/06/2013 5:52 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Exactly, you have to have something that the hard assets can be turned back into unless everyones just thrown in the towel and is now using a barter system which may work in very rural areas but is unlikely to catch on soon in developed nations especially metropolitan areas
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1684 Posts |
It would not appear what happened in Cyprus will become common practice in the Eurozone but what folks do not realize the tax payer will pay one way or another since the IMF needs to get the money from somewhere. How long can countries keep on loaning the IMF money? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...failure.html"Cyprus was a special case ... but the upcoming directive assumes that investor and depositor liability will be carried out in case of a bank restructuring or a wind-down," Mr Rehn, the European Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner. "But there is a very clear hierarchy, at first the shareholders, then possibly the unprotected investments and deposits. However, the limit of €100,000 (£85,000) is sacred, deposits smaller than that are always safe." There is interest in gold in the UK, since there is no VAT charged or Captial Gains while silver attracts a VAT charge of 20%. Ken
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: The same thing could have been said about the US two and a half centuries ago, but at least back then our leaders recognized the problem and retired the debt of the States. You can make some comparisons between the two, though with Europe they all have the own governments. California is our cyprus/greece though so there probably is more to that comparison than you would think at first. Retiring debt is better than just letting the whole system collapse, BUT you must be very careful about when you do it. For the states forming one nation is about as good of a reason as any though I'm not sure you could justify it now. If they did it at the formation of the Euro I could see that. If you do it too much though or set bad precedents with it you end up punishing the responsible and rewards spending yourself into oblivion since it wont matter if you just retire it. Do that one too many times or under the wrong circumstances and no one will be responsible anymore
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
"It would not appear what happened in Cyprus will become common practice in the Eurozone but what folks do not realize the tax payer will pay one way or another since the IMF needs to get the money from somewhere. How long can countries keep on loaning the IMF money?"
I would tend to agree unless someone needs a bailout prior to the reelection of Merkel.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
retiring debt = paying it off which is different than default. Either event does cause disinflation.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: retiring debt = paying it off Either way though its someone else footing the bill instead of chipping away at it over time which brings the same result of a country not being responsible for their own financial choices
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
"You can make some comparisons between the two, though with Europe they all have the own governments. California is our cyprus/greece though so there probably is more to that comparison than you would think at first."
So did the states and it varied greatly and had huge implications on trade among the States. When those countries lost their currencies there was no more liquidity tool whilethis is good news for gov't deficits, its bad news for trade as you will now get cleaned out. And lets face it, trade is what pays the bills.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
But if you lose business to a competitor who is devaluing then your debt burden rises, income falls. In 1960 If I lent you 100 pennies for 20 years and said I want you to pay me back in ten silver dimes at 1/2 of the prevailing interest rates, you would have borrowed from me more pennies then I could lend you and being a skilled banker I would've lent you far more pennies than I had. But come 1980 you would be completely sunk and I would have my own island because you made a decision based on a false perception. That is of course if you could actually afford to pay me. This is what essentially happened to Europe. Once they lost their currency they lost their ability to receive investment asthere was no local currency to hedge local risk. Just a small sovereign bond market with no international liquidity. An easy target.
Edited by wjl 04/06/2013 6:59 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
People seem to have a misunderstanding of golds role in a crisis. Gold doesn't respond to crisis positvely, in fact the exact opposite happens. What gold does respond to is the official response to the crisis which usually makes things worse for most everyone except banks. When nothing is working then people buy gold.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
Ken
The only ones who own Greek and Cyrprian bonds are the Greek and Cyprian banks. The hedge funds and trading banks don't actually own the bonds but rather some sort of derivative thereof.
Its so counterproductive what they did. It created much more $ in damage outside of Cyprus, then the whole country is worth. Capital controls are bad for business and without business even a small debt burden will crush you. The debts here are anything but small. But much like here in the US no price is too high to pay for reelection when you get to spend everyone elses money.
I agree with Nigel Farage. These are the most dangerous people in Europe since 1945. Their level of care for the economy and the people in it takes a back seat to their desire for empire building. That makes them no better then the crew from the 30s and 40s.
Edited by wjl 04/07/2013 08:13 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3789 Posts |
I again insist and have full faith that Cyprus is not a big deal... its a big *YAWN*. Again, it helps sell financial news headlines and catch eyeballs... nothing more.
Theres no panic. There is no collapse. It is a nonevent.
The ECB and its mighty hand are involved. Dont bet against CB's you will NEVER win.
Furthermore, if this was a big deal, we would have credit spreads get worse. Did that happen. No . No flight to safey in terms of silver and gold. One of my favorite metrics to follow is the TED spread,, thats going *YAWWWWNNN*...
folks Cyprus was all about picking off rich Russians money. nothing more.
As far as the Euro, if we are talking currency, it certainly has not been a failure. The EU has done what it wanted to do with Europe and is going through growing pains of sorts. This sort of thing is common with the EZ and will continue for the foreseeable future. No one, as usual because this is behind the scenes, talking about how great it is having the euro knocked down.. many euro companies are just loving this right now,, but keeping quiet.
BTW, german bunds are a great place to park your money in for now if you really want to benefit from euro noise.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
329 Posts |
This was not a credit event. However this is a huge problem for banks doing business in Southern Europe and business and it won't be immediately apparent. At the last G7 the Japanese realized there was a fool at that meeting and it was them. What this operation did was draw attention away from the currency war, but it will re assert itself and then gold will probably fly. Remember all these Euro countries have quite a bit of gold. Once there is nothing to be gained in exports because at some point diminishing returns set in and costs outweigh profits, the manipulation will one day go the other way and it will rise very very quickly. It may happen in a year or maybe in 3 years. When you play war with currency the end game will involve your gold stash. Make no mistake.
Edited by wjl 04/07/2013 6:26 pm
|
| |
Replies: 162 / Views: 12,396 |