Quote:I agree with CladKing. When was the last time you saw an honest to goodness XF or better 1965 quarter in circulation? Most of the ones I see are G-F. I read something interesting today in a 1931 issue of the Numismatist. The magazine staff pointed out that the mintage of 1930 cents was so high because that was the point where laymen started to pull
Indian cents out of circulation. If this is the reason- then it explains all the low grade
Indian cents that stuck around. The editors were against the practice, by the way, pointing out that they'd never be worth any kind of premium. Well, it took a nearly a hundred years, but you can get a decent return for every cent you put away.
Can the same be said about any modern day clad issues? It all depends on how long your historical reference point is.
Back in the '80's The Numismatist published a study that had been done in 1940 of the coins in circulation. It discovered that essentially all the 1909-S VDB cents were gone from circulation. They had been prefentially set aside by collectors. Not only was much of the mintage intercepted before it had a chance to circulate but by 1940 those that had gotten into pocket change had been pulled out.
Millions of "penny boards" made by Raymond and others had been sold during the depression when people had a lot of time on their hands and everyone needed this date. Today most of these are seen in Unc with a few AU's and lots of VF's and F's. Even during the '20's there were people setting aside rolls of new coins but this didn't take off until 1932.
Clad today has a completely different dynamic. People just never really set aside bags, rolls or even singles of clads. Until very recent times there weren't even serious collectors of clads. Whitman didn't even make one of their $2 folders for clad quarters until 1984 and, I'd wager, this board will be pretty scarce. It will be even scarcer filled in with a nice '69 quarter.
The point here is that even the scarcest clads circulate freely. Only in the last few years are we finally beginning to see things like the incidence of 1969 dimes in circulation beginning to fall a little relative other dates. Of course by now most of these old dimes are in poor shape so in the future there won't be much supply of things like AU's and XF's even if the price goes up and keeps them from being spent yet again.
Few collectors see what has been developing in clad for the last half a century (yes, next year). Lots of mint sets were made so everyone thinks the supply will forever be ample but they don't realize most of these sets are gone now because of low prices and many of the survivors are tarnished. TRhey also don't realize that every date doesn't come nice in the mint set. Sure, you can almost pick a '72-D quarter at random from a mint set still today and it will be nice but this doesn't apply to '69 dimes. Many of these ugly coins will simply be spent as will the Gems if the set is dismantled to melt the half dollar.
In the future there will be a few Gems surviving and significant numbers of unattractive specimens (250,000?). There will be a few XF's and VF's and there's still time to save a lot of F's. Most every date will be far scarcer than most
Indian cents in grades over G. But, many of these "better" clads won't really be better because they will be ugly and/ or tarnished coins from mint sets.
It's rather ironic that in the early dates the ugly mint set coins are much nicer than what was made for circulation.
The future is never set in stone but it is always dependent on current conditions. There can't be lots of AU's unless people pulled the coins out and they didn't. The vast majority of most dates are already either destroyed permanently or worn out in circulation.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.