| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,550 |
|
|
New Member
United States
23 Posts |
Good looking coin, just not experienced enough to know how good. Thanks in advance for your opinions!   Edited by nandemo1
08/17/2013 10:59 am
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
220 Posts |
I'm guessing AU-55. Just a tiny bit of contact wear on sideburn and cross of crown.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2135 Posts |
Perhaps it's how the image appears on my monitor, however I was thinking GVF apart from what looks like encrustation (verdigris ?) under the obv legend and all the rev design.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
638 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1330 Posts |
beautiful coin with lots of detail still left ms62/63 for sure
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1844 Posts |
When enlarged you can see lot of wear on the high points.... Best guess is AU or AU55 with trace of Red
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
AU-58 just a touch of wear
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9866 Posts |
AU55
Toning is where lustre has been broken.
Loss of detail on high points appears due to wear rather than quality of strike.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
It's definitely not an MS coin. Flatness in the band at the 2nd set of jewels ...is the biggest problem for me... too much shine/contact/wear in the high spots of the beard... ..slight contact in the collar at the highest point near the neck... AU55 at best ...IMHO...  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
972 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5402 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,550 |
|
Posted 08/17/2013 12:18 am
