| Author |
 Replies: 38 / Views: 8,181 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
937 Posts |
...and sold for $390. If it's real someone just got a sweet deal...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1152 Posts |
Definitely an altered date in my opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4418 Posts |
Quote:
If it's real someone just got a sweet deal... It obviously lacks the telltale die markers, explained earlier in this thread. Then too, if it was real, the price would have skyrocketed. A second, genuine piece just recently sold for thousands in a Nova Scotia auction. Sadly, this altered date piece, crude as it appears, will likely be resold to future collectors who fail to do their homework. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
It is a genuine forgery.
I suspected it would generate some interest as a contemporary forgery.
Amongst collectors, some forgeries are rare and command some value.
I bid $150.00 on it solely to use as an educational piece.
doug
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4418 Posts |
Hi Doug ... I once did something similar, intentionally buying a counterfeit 1916-D dime for $50, solely for educational purposes. I used it periodically to test and inform coin club members so that they'd exercise caution when buying key coins.
Not wanting to sound overly contentious, mind you ... What is a "genuine forgery" as you say .... A "genuine forgery" as opposed to what?
You also wrote that this is a "contemporary forgery." I'm at a loss to explain when this piece was forged. I'd guess 1890 or later. This coin appears to me to have incurred decades of circulation wear, prior to the date being altered. By using the term contemporary, are you of the opinion that this forgery was performed in the 1820-30's? I don't envision that possibility with this piece; and, not simply because of the wear but also because during that time, the 1825 dates were not legal issue. Your thoughts, Doug?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
This is a genuine token of which the date was maliciously altered
in contrast to a counterfeit of the entire coin / token. The actual
coin / token is genuine. The deliberate alteration of the date of
the coin / token is a forgery.
'Contemporary forgery,'(I do not know who first monikered this term),
refers to forgeries that were made a long time ago (contemporaneous
with the era of the original coin / token). This is contrasted modern
day forgeries.
Sorry about the confusion.
doug
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4418 Posts |
And it's back, again, with a new, much higher price. This fake was purchased as sucker bait, it seems ... http://www.ebay.com/itm/Interesting...keTrack=trueBUT ... if one clicks on additional information, THEN it's described as a contemporary forgery. Contemporary to when ... 1830's, 1840's ... 1890's or early twentieth century? Edited by ExoGuy
07/02/2015 1:02 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
At least the narrative is honest.
I passed on the initial auction at
$150.00 and I will not entertain
bidding on this auction.
doug
|
| |
Replies: 38 / Views: 8,181 |
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 06/21/2015 6:26 pm
