| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,130 |
|
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
Hi all, new to the Coin World... Can anyone give me an opinion on the grade of this coin. Thanks!  
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
339 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Korea, Republic Of
1881 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
AU details, cleaned. The coin has a unnatural shine to it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Lower end of AU I don't see any serious issues
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
 with AU details.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I lean towards XF45 for this one - there's a bit too much missing detail on the reverse, and no indication strike quality was involved. The surfaces seem a bit questionable in the (excellent) images, but it's a look which circulated coinage can have if it acquired some of that toning while still in circulation. This isn't a process we're used to with modern clad coinage, but silver toning while in circulation wasn't uncommon.
Still an added-value issue either way - it's probably a $75 coin even as a cleaned XF, double that for a righteous AU50.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,130 |
|