Well Ill find out today. I'm getting it looked at. Don't want to get too exited especially since it was free. But I have a feeling it wasn't copper plated after minting process. The burn marks are probably after it was minted but the coin itself looks to be pure copper. where the marks are on the edge of the coin it melted 4 points on the edge and indented enough to notice that its copper more than surface thick throughout the coin. Its hard to see in the pictures. Also the burn marks looks like residual copper dust got melted onto the surface like gunpowder to metal.
well guy at coin shop believes it was stripped of silver. still believe that that cant be because of how thick it is, and how well definition of Monticello is. well I'm going to stash it away and hold onto it even if its not worth anything.
You can't strip the thing of silver and them have it bigger and weigh more without the silver. you would end up with microscopic o larger swiss-cheese holes and pathways where the silver was taken out.
The only way I could figure that to work would be like I said earlier if it was used as the cathode or anode of a battery that maybe had 4 posts that coins fit into to stabilize them and little plast4es placed on them then filled with some form of acid, but then the details shouldn't be so clear.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use