Nothing wrong with posting only one side but in most cases it is beneficial to show both sides - either for the beauty of seeing both sides of the coin or to provide a proper judgement. Was not meant as a criticism but rather a recommendation. (When you look at my topic on official countermarks, I have shown several times only one side because the other side was not important to the countermark [and had nothing else going for it].)
It was a fake ancient denarius of Julia Paula, bought from a dealer in the U.K. I didn't check it for authenticity, and it was revealed to me by a Sydney dealer, by bending it with his fingers. I thereupon gave it to him, to add it to his reference fake ancient collection.
Occasionally, I will test a suspect freshly made lead coin by bending it. No loss in value if you damage a fake coin, and a genuine coin will stand up easily to this simple test, so no loss either way.
Sometimes the alloy is of pewter or lead / tin, and they are a little harder to bend, but they stay brighter for longer.
There is no problem from this viewpoint in this case, however.
I only collect Japanese coins (older ones at this time) & also fakes. I have some fake 100 Mons & a copper 1 Bu & a bronze 1 Bu. Was curious what a fake lead coin looked like.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use