I know what you're saying, but by all definitions it is in fact a counterfeit coin;
http://thelawdictionary.org/counterfeit-coin/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfeit
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedict.../counterfeit
If this would not be deemed as counterfeit, how else did it find it's way into circulation?
If there is leverage for "coins" like this, then why would there not be leverage in the law to permit collectors to posses known counterfeit coins;
The Charelton catalog lists counterfeit colonial tokens ect - but those are as I understood it from others here as ok, because they do not have an image of the queen - while this does.
http://thelawdictionary.org/counterfeit-coin/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfeit
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedict.../counterfeit
If this would not be deemed as counterfeit, how else did it find it's way into circulation?
If there is leverage for "coins" like this, then why would there not be leverage in the law to permit collectors to posses known counterfeit coins;
The Charelton catalog lists counterfeit colonial tokens ect - but those are as I understood it from others here as ok, because they do not have an image of the queen - while this does.























