Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Noodling Stats - Australian 5c, 10c And 20c Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 3,921Next Topic  
Valued Member

Australia
248 Posts
 Posted 03/26/2016  07:41 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Hercules to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This is what you can expect to find from $96 worth of 5c coins, $480 worth of 10c coins, and $384 worth of 20c coins.

The numbers don't add up exactly because I've excluded all the foreign coins and NCLT, which account for seven 5c coins, twelve 10c coins, and eleven 20c coins.

In total, there are 1913 5c coins, 4788 10c coins, and 1909 20c coins included in this sample.

I've also kept statistics on varieties and errors, but there are just so many of them that they deserve a separate post.

My desk is covered with coins at the moment, so I'm going to wait until I've cleared it before I post further details.

Noodling-Stats---Australian-5c,-10c-And-20c-Coins

Noodling-Stats---Australian-5c,-10c-And-20c-Coins

Noodling-Stats---Australian-5c,-10c-And-20c-Coins
Pillar of the Community
MobOfRoos's Avatar
Australia
762 Posts
 Posted 03/27/2016  9:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MobOfRoos to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


Good work once again Hercules.
I always find there sorts of stats fascinating.

Its interesting how common the 1971 20c still is despite it's low mintage. (I've found the same thing from my own noodling).

My theory on that is that in the 70s and 80s the 20c was still worth enough that not many of them got lost or destroyed.
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1005 Posts
 Posted 03/27/2016  11:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ozcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for sharing your stats Hurcules.
One thing about stats like this - you need an awful lot before you can say that the numbers are statistically significant.
For example:
1. I have found a 1972 5c in $10 worth of 5c.
Or
2. I have gone a much longer time than you would expect between finds of 1972 5c in the past. I think I searched through more than $350 without finding any.
Even with heaps of data, the distribution of coins is not always even around the country, so stats for 2000 $1/10c mules or 2000 incuse flag 50c in Melbourne or Perth may be different to Sydney.
Stats are great (and I like doing this sort of analysis), just don't lose sight of other factors too.
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1005 Posts
 Posted 03/28/2016  12:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ozcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
P.S.
I have also used stats to help find that the mint made a mistake in the number of 1977 10c
There was another thread I started on here that the number I was finding did not match with what the mint was showing. Another member found older punished numbers which seem more accurate.
Valued Member
Australia
248 Posts
 Posted 03/28/2016  10:08 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hercules to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Its interesting how common the 1971 20c still is despite it's low mintage. (I've found the same thing from my own noodling).

My theory on that is that in the 70s and 80s the 20c was still worth enough that not many of them got lost or destroyed.


I came to the exact same conclusion yesterday evening. I was going to keep all the 20c coins that I noodled with the Arnold Machin portrait on them, but then when I realised that I could barely carry them at once, I decided to take them all back to the bank.

Based on official mintage figures, the 1971 20c ought to be just as rare as the 1972 5c, but in reality, it's much more common. It really makes me wonder just how accurate the mint's official figures are.


Quote:
One thing about stats like this - you need an awful lot before you can say that the numbers are statistically significant.


I'm fully aware of this problem, which is why I'm trying to create as big a sample size as possible. I'm hoping that it will eventually reach the point where it becomes statistically significant. If not, then it will still be useful as a guide.

How big a sample size do you think I'll need in order for the figures to become statistically significant?


Quote:
For example:
1. I have found a 1972 5c in $10 worth of 5c.
Or
2. I have gone a much longer time than you would expect between finds of 1972 5c in the past. I think I searched through more than $350 without finding any.


I've had similar experiences in the past. Some of the coins I've found were so rare that my eyes almost popped out when I saw them, yet others that were relatively common have taken me decades to find. There really is a lot of luck in this, and people will notice this once I start talking about errors and varieties.


Quote:
I have also used stats to help find that the mint made a mistake in the number of 1977 10c
There was another thread I started on here that the number I was finding did not match with what the mint was showing. Another member found older punished numbers which seem more accurate.


I read your thread several months ago, and my stats support the higher mintage figure, but I'm afraid it's not the only error. Several years ago, the mint published the wrong mintage for the 2010 circulating standard 20c coin on their website, and popular coin guides like Maccas and Renniks copied it. Maccas has only just realised the mistake and corrected it, whereas Renniks is still printing the incorrect figure. I can think of several other examples, but this is the most serious.
Edited by Hercules
03/28/2016 10:32 am
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1005 Posts
 Posted 03/29/2016  09:42 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ozcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
"How big a sample size do you think I'll need in order for the figures to become statistically significant?"

That is a good question. I have put some thought into this in the past but not come toany conclusion.

I guess the aim would be to decide a number, that if you got another lot of coins the same size, you would have the same stats between the two sets.
I guess that might happen with $2000 of 5c - but that is just a feeling rather than something I can properly back up with numbers.
Removing just released coins from the samples may help, as you may get a big bunch of them in one go.
If you are looking through that many coins in different batches, you may get your own coins back at some point and end up double counting some.
Also getting someone else's (or your own) rejects will lower the stats for coins that get collected.
Valued Member
Australia
248 Posts
 Posted 03/30/2016  07:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hercules to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If you are looking through that many coins in different batches, you may get your own coins back at some point and end up double counting some.
Also getting someone else's (or your own) rejects will lower the stats for coins that get collected.


I've often wondered about this, but because I'm getting my coins in rolls instead of bags, I think the risk is minimal. Do any of the major banks possess the ability to roll their own coins? Does having the name of a security company printed on the packaging ensure that the coins came from a centralised location, and thereby got mixed up with many others?

I thought it was interesting how the first few batches of 10c coins I noodled had one 1991 and 1997 on average, but then when I returned those coins to the bank, the well of 1991s and 1997s suddenly dried up and I started getting a 2011 in each batch. Now, the well of 2011s has also dried up, and I've started getting 1985s. Is this normal behaviour for a random sample?
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 3,921Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to rattle this change. Forums