Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Common Error On 1955 Pennies On Reverse Weak O In One And PL In Pluribus?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,066Next Topic  
New Member

United States
18 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2016  12:13 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Tonybaloney to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Last year I bought a roll of uncirculated 1955 D pennies but only just recently had time to go through them. I noticed that about 33 of the 50 coins had this weak strike area on the upper left portion of the O in the word One and the PL in Pluribus were weaker at bottoms. A few had die cracks over the dot between the E and P in pluribus. Is it common or is there any value? I add a few of the better shown errors for clrification. Apologies in advance for poor photos.

Common-Error-On-1955-Pennies-On-Reverse-Weak-O-In-One-And-PL-In-Pluribus?

Common-Error-On-1955-Pennies-On-Reverse-Weak-O-In-One-And-PL-In-Pluribus?

Common-Error-On-1955-Pennies-On-Reverse-Weak-O-In-One-And-PL-In-Pluribus?
Pillar of the Community
Dustin6's Avatar
United States
3516 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2016  12:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dustin6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
to CCF!! I would say the coins were struck by a die that was abraded a bit. That would cause the O to be a bit weaker. The die cracks unless in a certain location or being a Retained Cud or IBD would not make a premium. For value, I would say an average Mint state coin of that date would go for 1-2 dollars
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Cujohn's Avatar
United States
7174 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2016  1:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Cujohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is common on wheat cents. Notice a little ghosting on the rev. the area of the O is where the shoulder is on the obv. The shoulder takes a lot of material to fill in so it has to take it from the rev.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2016  5:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Also you have to factor in the strike is strongest opposite this area. So it is normal to see a weakness on the the 'O' on ONE. Reverse is showing Progressive Indirect Design Transfer (PIDT)
Common-Error-On-1955-Pennies-On-Reverse-Weak-O-In-One-And-PL-In-Pluribus?
Common-Error-On-1955-Pennies-On-Reverse-Weak-O-In-One-And-PL-In-Pluribus?
On Memorial cents as well.
Common-Error-On-1955-Pennies-On-Reverse-Weak-O-In-One-And-PL-In-Pluribus?
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,066Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums