| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,444 |
|
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
Grading opinions please.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7644 Posts |
AU condition but not sure about authenticity. The lack of sharp details is a huge red flag in my book.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36903 Posts |
If genuine, which I have my doubts, AU, but hard to tell what you have from these photos.
|
|
New Member
 United States
12 Posts |
Thanks for your input. I will try to take better photos. What makes you think it isn't authentic?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
Counterfeit! Mushy details, wrong color. Take a sharp image and i'll add more reasons fr my opinion. Looks like tool marks on the lower reverse.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sharper image needed for sure.  to the CCF! |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5686 Posts |
Need a clearer photo. The color may be due to lighting.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
The round berries on the reverse at 12 OC have nothing to do with the lighting. This is a characteristic fund on decades old fakes. Pull up an image of a genuine Type three gold coin and compare the design :)
|
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
Is this picture better?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7644 Posts |
Much better obverse picture, but I still think it is counterfeit. Lack of sharpness in the details along with the off-center obverse strike screams questionable authenticity to me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36903 Posts |
Mushy details especially the lettering, razor sharp edge. Small lumps on the surface. This one looks like a Lebanese counterfeit to me.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
Agree. old Lebanese fake from the 1970's. It is gold. Tool marks from the rim over the "E's"
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,444 |
|
Posted 06/04/2017 11:04 am
