| Author |
Replies: 76 / Views: 25,929 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
superDave, Hi, and hope this finds you in good spirits! FYI, I found out that the thacks CAN be cut, (very casrefully, watching out for hanging burrs, etc), I found both the 35 watt, and regular 50 watt bulbs for the lights. I also found a track fan, 2-speed, with chain, and off/on sw. That should help the heat problem. I am going to try and re-work one of the "tee-fittings", to work as a 90 degree connector. Wish me luck. Maybe end up with a square, or at least a parallel setyp. Dick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
Hi, SuperDave, Another question: What do you think of a "square track", about `12" on a side, for the lights? I tried the 4', and 2' tracks today, and they take up a lot of room. I also have a set of 35 watt lites, but they are very close coupled, but might work, if mounted on the sides of the setup, rather than on top. Do you think there would be any problem with shadows in that position, (cardinal points, but close in)? thanks, Dick
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
I think that's an excellent idea, Dick. Keep in mind, you want to create a little shadow in your pictures - that helps sharpen the meeting of fields and devices. So, if you're going to use cardinal points, use adjacent ones rather than opposite ones.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
Hi Superdave, I just read your reply. I didn't know there would make any difference, with the direction! I'll keep that in mind. thanks Dick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1291 Posts |
SuperDave - I've been a forum member for about 5 months and just now stumbled upon this thread. Probably the last thing you need or want is more praise and more thanks for writing such an in-depth, helpful, concise, easily understood and totally enjoyable topic but..... TOUGH BEANS! Thank you, this is GREAT stuff! My old 5 Megapixel Canon S500 Digital Elph recently died (after 5 years and more than 100,000 shots) and I have been struggling mightily to understand how to get the most out of my new A2000 IS Powershot, and your explanations and suggestions in this topic are proving to be invaluable. Thanks again! Steve
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: Probably the last thing you need or want is more praise and more thanks for writing such an in-depth, helpful, concise, easily understood and totally enjoyable topic but..... TOUGH BEANS! Nah, go ahead - I like compliments just as much as the next guy.  Seriously, though, I get more of a charge from seeing people I helped get compliments on the quality of their pics than I do getting compliments on the quality of my own pics - if Coin Community becomes known for the quality of the photography presented on the site, we all win. I'm pretty competitive - if you guys are challenging the quality of my own work, it's great incentive for me to get better at it. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
superDave, Here is a pair of RAW shots. They are with just the overhead light, vertical, 4-1/2" below camera, easy setting, hand fired. The coin is a 1986-P Ellis Island Commorative dollar, SANDCAST, which was given , along with a 1844 Sitting Liberty dollar, for payment for food. Both coins are CuNi, and obviously magnetic. The weight is 26.73 grams, if silver. This one weighs 19 grams.   This coin, and the other, as well found in Rialto, CA, yesterday. They were given to my D-I-L, to pay for some food. I have not examined the other, than to look at it for a few minutes before taking my wife to ER, with very high BP. Will post shot of the other when available. Later: Tjhe other two coins are a 1844 seated Liberty, and a 1796 flowing hair dollars. All three aere CuNi, and magnetic. The close view with a scope shows definite sandcast, with touch up afterwards. I have taken several pictures of the others, and an edge shot of the Ellis Island coins, id anyone would like to see them, just ask for them. They are all counterdeit, and can get one a bunch of trouble if attempted to use to defraud. Thee one I have is the flowing hair, and is for educational use only. Dick
Edited by livingdinasaur 04/18/2009 11:02 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
SuperDave, would you comment on this picture? It was shot with max zoom, on the scope, and 4.0X optical, no flask, in flip, and amplifired in the processor. Is it worth the effort, or am I on the "wrong horse"? thanks,  The coin is a 1955-D BU. The text should read split serifs.... Dick
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
Very much worth the effort, Dick. Especially in the case of minute details like you're showing there, you might find that you like switching it to black and white. Sometimes the color just gets in the way, and you don't need it for micro-photography.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
SuperDave, thanks for the reply. I didn't worry too much about the color. It probably would make it easier to see. I was just experimwenting with what I have, and what I know, so far. I wanted the details, and combined all I have, to show. It seemed to have worked out!. I still haven't been able to get into the processor end, but that is coming, (some dayLOL) Dick
|
|
Valued Member
United States
82 Posts |
That was very informative. I will definitely try this out. Thanks super Dave
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
hawk, you will find that if there is someone that can take a picture, SuperDave is among the best! Not to mention the most patient, as well. he has put up with me,and I actually have learned a lot of things from his teaching. Go for it! Dick
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
I don't know why I didn't do it then - I was going to alter the detail pic to show the difference in clarity when you desaturate a micro-image, thusly:  Maybe it's just me, but I like this stuff better in black and white.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
SuperDave, Thanks for your response, and suggestion. I don't think I would care for the black & white, because I have trouble with the lack of light in pictures. I might go for the grayscale version. it would be a test, for effect. By brother sent me some photos, that were sgot into a shadowed area, and I can'r tell what he was looking at. that is what I am undergoing with the picture you posred. I see more with the color, or in grayscale. The black, is what I see most of, because there is no image there to see. Referring to my retinas, of course. Just for effect, could you do one in grayscale, for me? I would know which way to jump, having all the info. just a comment on the general photography, (my area), I don't ise any light, except the little energy-saving light, the twisted type, and it is six feet away. I'm surprised at the amount of light it produces. Still have the track-lighting, but it is very bright, even with the 35 watt lighss. More work to do in this area, but you have given the info necessary to make headway, and you might say " I am underway"! thanks again, Dick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
Awesome thread. Can someone make this a sticky at the top of the page? Or perhaps just have the main details (and not all the extraneous posts) in a sticky?
|
| |
Replies: 76 / Views: 25,929 |