| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,214 |
|
Valued Member
United States
179 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
AU-53, almost certainly cleaned, although the photographs are to white to tell for certain.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
179 Posts |
Thanks! hopefully these pics are better.  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2850 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Quote: Details? Why? Yeah , that's what I'd like to know , Why buy a polished detailed Walker ? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2850 Posts |
Quote: Details? Why? Cleaned and/or polished. Surfaces do not look natural.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Later photos confirm cleaned.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
179 Posts |
Interesting discussion, glad I posted. Finally, I don't think I take good pics with my cell phone, and then they have to be compressed to some degree. Here's some from my USB microscope.  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I am thinking AU-55 from those pictures, and I would say not Details.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Ok , new photos with your microscope dismisses a cleaned or polished coin . AU-55 .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1339 Posts |
AU58, not a great strike, great at melt!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2850 Posts |
Yes, new photos look better. AU 55.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36901 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,214 |