| Author |
Replies: 750 / Views: 65,455 |
|
|
|
Moderator
  United States
34418 Posts |
Bumping this thread to remind folks that we are looking for a coin minted in the decade of the 1140s AD. 
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
 Zangid Atabegs of Aleppo, Nur al-Din Mahmud, 1146-1174, undated AE fals, Halab (Aleppo) mint. Imitates the Byzantine coinage of Constantine X, an unusual instance of an Islamic coin depicting Christ.
Edited by Kushanshah 04/22/2018 10:04 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
I believe the rules require a coin to have a date range of no more than ten years for the thread to proceed. That said, it's a very interesting piece and I'm glad to see it. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
On that note, I'd like to propose an amendment to the rules. I think that rather than just requiring the first year of a coin's date range to fall within the decade, we could remove the 10 year maximum as long as the majority of the range falls in the decade. That way, a coin minted between 1149 and 1158 would not qualify for the 1140s (as it currently would), while one from 1138-1149 would (as it currently wouldn't). Of course, the range would still have to be under 20 years. I would also not mind just requiring the entire range to fall within the decade.
Edited by Numisma 04/22/2018 10:24 pm
|
|
Moderator
  United States
34418 Posts |
@Kushanshah, yes very nice coin and I'm glad you posted it, but unfortunately for the purposes of this thread, the date range is a bit too broad. According to the rules that I set up at the start (which were based on the first version of this thread started by @medieval), coins need to be dateable to a ten year time-span, although I think that we may have already let one with an 11 year time-span pass. @numisma, proposing that the majority of the ten-year time span be in the "correct" decade is a pretty interesting wrinkle, but I hope that you don't mind if we stay the course on this thread and keep it as being in whichever decade the time span begins. I'm fine with this thread proceeding by fits and starts or even spurring us to expand our collections!  I have a couple coins that were minted over a 14 year time span beginning in the 1140s. If we get desperate for progress, then I'm kinda thinking that the best route will be to expand our definition of a "decade".
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
Quote: @numisma, proposing that the majority of the ten-year time span be in the "correct" decade is a pretty interesting wrinkle, but I hope that you don't mind if we stay the course on this thread and keep it as being in whichever decade the time span begins. I'm fine with this thread proceeding by fits and starts or even spurring us to expand our collections! Fair enough, I suppose it's good not to change up the rules part way through. 
|
|
Moderator
  United States
34418 Posts |
As this thread has recently dropped off of the front page in the ancients/medievals section of CCF, it is probably time for another bump. As a reminder, we are looking for coins minted in the decade of the 1140s. By way of example of a coin that might have been minted in the correct decade, but can't move us backward as the date range is too large, here is a Tari from Norman Sicily. It was minted in Siqilliya between 1140 and 1154 AD and is attributed as Biaggi 1220. It was one of my first gold coins and that total number remains stubbornly small even to this day.  
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7947 Posts |
Very nice coin! One always remembers the first gold  I have been keeping an eye out for coins that fit the requirements for this decade. For anyone with some spare cash, I saw this Magdeburg bracteate: http://www.elsen.eu/List-284/MOYEN-.../eitem/69297
|
|
Moderator
  United States
34418 Posts |
I've done a little digging for information and the bracteates of Friedrich I von Wettin see to be the only relatively available pieces that meet our criteria. They are a bit spendy (and even were back in 1977 when Dr. Bonhoff's collection was auctioned (a particularly nice example was listed at 500 DM).
I have also looked more closely at the first version of this thread and found that there were some decades where the "decade = ten years" rule was stretched a bit, even beyond the 11 years that we have already used on this thread. For example, the coin used to move that thread beyond the 1140s was a Byzantine Half-Tetarteron minted between 1143 and 1180 AD.
At this point, we have been stuck on the decade of the 1140s since April 10, 2018. As we are now approaching the two month mark, I'm wondering what folks would like to do:
1. Expand our definition of "decade" to include 15 years, in which case we can move forward.
-or-
2. Keep to our current definition and wait for someone to show up with a coin minted for 11 years or less, starting in the decade of the 1140s.
I tend to be a bit of a stickler for rules, but this is tempered by my wish to keep this thread a vibrant part of the ancients and medievals section of CCF. Please respond with your preference in the next few days and I'll go with the majority vote.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
1185 Posts |
Quote: It was one of my first gold coins and that total number remains stubbornly small even to this day. what can it be else than the overwhelming charm of old silver? my vote favors the idea to relax the idea of a decade a little it will be fascinating to browse through a thread with an overview of the history of coins from antiquity to present
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5174 Posts |
I know that I've seen multiple coins of Stephen and/or Matilda posted on CCF before. Surely some of them should be from the 1140s, especially of Matilda (reigned 1141-1147).
And, for the record, I'm in favor of waiting until an applicable coin appears. Seriously, it had barely been a month. Didn't we wait even longer for an 1170s coin before my example happened to show up?
(As for the old thread: it arrived at the 12th century shortly after Medieval's never-explained disappearance, and at least one of the thread's interim caretakers didn't really get the point of "waiting until an applicable coin is posted" and tried their best to advance a decade every day. I tried to complain at the time, apparently, but it doesn't look like anybody noticed.)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7947 Posts |
I am afflicted with the impetuousness of youth (  ) and an appetite for seeing coins I hav e never seen before, and vote to relax the rule. (Not to mention, I am armed with a coin from the 1130s).
|
|
Moderator
  United States
34418 Posts |
All have good points. So far we are 2:1 in favor of loosening our definition of a decade. Looking for some more votes from others. 
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Spain
2752 Posts |
Great thread....I'll be able to contribute to the decades 1100's,1110's and 1120's but I agree with j1 to hold fire a bit longer...
Paul
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1186 Posts |
I have several Bela II Denars 1131-41,but that would fit in the 1130's decade.
|
| |
Replies: 750 / Views: 65,455 |